"The Confusing Rhetoric out of Washington on Venezuela"
Wilder Alejandro Sanchez
Providence
8 May, 2019
Originally published: https://providencemag.com/2019/05/confusing-rhetoric-washington-venezuela/
While discussing the situation in Venezuela, US Secretary of State
Mike Pompeo recently stated that “military action is possible.” The
remarks came after a new round of violence and an apparently failed uprising against the regime of de facto President Nicolás Maduro.
At this point, it is necessary to discuss the rhetoric utilized by
the White House and US Congress regarding Venezuela, compared to how
senior US military commanders discuss the situation and the possibility
of US military action in the South American country.
Pro-Intervention: Pompeo and Scott
The White House has generally maintained a fiery rhetoric regarding Venezuela. For example, on May 1 on Fox Business
Maria Bartiromo asked Pompeo, “Is the US support going to include
troops? Are the military troops in the US going to head there and
support Guaidó?” He responded:
The president has been crystal clear and incredibly consistent.
Military action is possible. If that’s what’s required, that’s what the
United States will do. We’re trying to do everything we can to avoid
violence. We’ve asked all the parties involved not to engage in that
kind of activity
The phrase “military action is possible,” has been widely quoted.
Secretary Pompeo is hardly the only individual that has made such
provocative remarks, as Senator Rick Scott (R-FL) made a similar
statement at the American Enterprise Institute
in Washington, DC. During his April 11 speech, he stated that the
Maduro regime “represents a clear and present danger to the entire
Western Hemisphere,” hence “all options, including the use of American
military assets, must remain on the table.” Moreover, given the
humanitarian crisis in the South American country, “it is becoming clear
that we will have to consider the use of American military assets to
deliver aid.”
The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect those of any institutions with which the author is associated.
No comments:
Post a Comment