Showing posts with label one belt one road. Show all posts
Showing posts with label one belt one road. Show all posts

Monday, April 29, 2024

The Diplomat: " Sino-Kyrgyz Relations: A (Very) One-sided Relationship"

 

"Sino-Kyrgyz Relations: A (Very) One-sided Relationship"

Wilder Alejandro Sanchez

Crossroads Asia

The Diplomat

29 April 2024

Originally published: https://thediplomat.com/2024/04/sino-kyrgyz-relations-a-very-one-sided-relationship/

On the one hand, China and the BRI have aided Kyrgyzstan in opening up to global trade. On the other hand, Bishkek’s debt and dependency on Beijing’s loans are alarming.

Continue reading... 

Tuesday, February 5, 2019

Interviewed in: The buckle on the Belt and Road

"The buckle on the Belt and Road"



https://www.asianaffairs.in/magazine/the-buckle-on-the-belt-and-road/

Kazakhstan’s friendship with China has been rewarded with massive investment, and the Central Asian nation now regards itself as the buckle on the Belt and Road trade route connecting China with its lucrative European market. As trade flows Kazakhstan’s economy is growing but, contend Duncan Bartlett and Alice Jackson, there’s a long way to go before it achieves its goal of becoming a modern, middle-income country

Kazakhstan’s railways are a proud symbol of its ambition to be at the centre of international trade. One could, if one wished, travel by train from the Dzungarian Gate on its Eastern border, all the way down south to China’s prosperous Yangtze region. Or one could go several thousand kilometres westwards to the German city of Duisburg, the world’s largest inland port.

Only a few privileged people undertake such epic journeys. They are usually seated in the cabin of locomotives, which pull lengthy goods trains from China to Europe. About 40 such trains pass through Kazakhstan each week, a halfway point on a journey which takes about a fortnight to complete. A similar trip by sea takes more than a month. That places Kazakhstan in a strategic position, at the centre of one of the world’s most important trade routes.

Chinese money

As a result, Chinese investment has flowed into Kazakhstan, funding railway tracks, stations, landports and depots. At the same time, people-to-people relations have deepened: many ethnic Chinese have moved to Kazakhstan and many Kazakhs live in China.

Wilder Alejandro Sanchez, an analyst who focuses on geopolitical, military and cybersecurity issues, says: ‘Because of its unique geographical position, Kazakhstan has to conduct a careful foreign policy. It is far from Europe and far from the United States. It has a border with China on one side and a border with Russia on the other, so it must balance relations with Beijing and Moscow carefully. It cannot afford to antagonise either global power.’

Power broker

Kazakhstan is the world’s biggest producer of uranium, the key component of nuclear power generators and nuclear weapons. That provides plenty of customers but it is the Chinese who offer the prized investment money.

The country’s President Nursultan Nazarbayev makes frequent visits to Beijing to meet with his counterpart Xi Jinping. With the aim of Kazakhstan being among the world’s 30 most developed countries by 2050, he hopes that the Chinese investment will help boost the economy and lift the income of his citizens to similar levels enjoyed by people living in central Europe.

It is predicted that Kazakh GDP will grow by around 4 percent this year. While the poverty level is low, income inequality is marked, particularly between the wealthy urban elite and the rural poor.

Learning opportunity

The President has pledged to raise spending on healthcare, science and education, and there will be a particular focus on learning English. Schools are now teaching children to write using Latin letters as well as the Cyrillic alphabet, which should make life easier for users of computers, particularly people who write code.

Alongside greater educational achievement comes greater aspiration. The country is trying to avoid a brain drain. Its Vice Minister for Labour and Social Protection, Nurzhan Altayev, has said that although migration is not a major problem, in a nation of 18 million citizens– and with global aspirations – it is important to encourage people, particularly the young,to commit to life in their home country.

The government has established a scholarship programme, called Bolashak, which enables bright students to travel abroad to study for four years – after which they must promise to return home and use their talents to serve the country.

The Russian factor

Kazakhstan’s rich natural resources include not just uranium but also considerable reserves of oil, coal and natural gas, alongside significant deposits of zinc and lead. As it has limited capacity to process any of these materials domestically it relies on other countries to buy the commodities and refine them. Russia has long been a key economic partner in this process and the Russian language is widely understood.

Yet Kazakhstan is keen to diversify beyond the extractive industries. As former Foreign Minister Roman Vassilenko noted: ‘As we seek to further modernise, we naturally need to strengthen our efforts to attract a diversified range of foreign investments and technologies as part of mutually beneficial partnerships.’

President Nazarbayev encourages further market-oriented reforms. He also tries to balance the quest for modernisation with his effort to maintain warm relations with both the Russians and the Chinese. Domestically, he faces no significant political opposition and his autocratic approach constrains press criticism. However, at 78 years of age, he may not be able to maintain complete control for much longer.

According to Wilder Alejandro Sanchez, ‘It is widely speculated that this could be President Nazarbayev’s last term in power and there is even talk of early elections. The question is whether his successor will be handpicked, and how this future leader will shape Kazakhstan’s domestic and foreign policies and priorities.’

Mr Sanchez also asks whether the next President will be as committed to reform as Mr Nazarbayev. ‘Will the person who follows him stick to the modernisation goals, or will they take a 180-degree turn and follow a completely different approach?’

The most likely outcome is that whoever takes power after President Nazarbayev will pledge to spur further economic development, as well as to burnish the country’s internal image.

‘In a sense the country has been very successful,’ says Mr Sanchez,‘considering where it came from following independence in the early 1990s. There’s a great deal of stability and there is also patriotic pride in being Kazakhstani. Whenever I talk to my friends, they are always keen to point to their homeland’s numerous achievements in the past couple of decades.’


The researcher on this article was Alice Jackson, an MA graduate from the University of Sussex, specialising in geopolitics and grand strategy, East Asian economic development, and postcolonial critical theory. She also holds a BA in Geography from the University of Leicester, with specific focus on identity theory and the production of culture within space. 

Duncan Bartlett is the Editor of Asian Affairs and a former BBC correspondent



Thursday, April 26, 2018

Geopolitical Monitor: Kazakhstan’s Foreign Policy: Escaping Geography in 2018

"Kazakhstan’s Foreign Policy: Escaping Geography in 2018"
Wilder Alejandro Sanchez
Opinion
Geopolitical Monitor
26 April 2018
Originally published: https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/kazakhstans-foreign-policy-escaping-geography-in-2018/

Astana approaches Washington….
Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev met with US President Donald Trump in Washington DC on 16 January 2018, which was a major diplomatic victory for the Central Asian state. As part of the visit, the US Department of State praised bilateral ties, highlighting in a press release how trade “grew to $1.9 billion in 2016.”  Additionally, the renowned think tank Atlantic Council held an event in January with the Kazakh ambassador to the U.S., H.E. Erzhan Kazykhanov, to discuss bilateral relations. The two governments have also increased military ties and there have been new initiatives related to cooperating on nuclear energy issues.

Moreover, the Kazakh government is committed to exposing its youth to the West as a Kazakh government official explained to the author that as many as 2,500 Kazakh students are currently attending universities in the United States.


….But Moscow and Beijing still exist
Nevertheless, it would be a mistake to assume that the Kazakh government is “pivoting” toward the West. That’s where geography kicks in. After all, the Central Asian state has a border with Russia that extends over six thousand kilometers, and also has an ethnic Russian population in the northern part of the country. Additionally, Kazakhstan is part of Moscow-backed multinational organizations, such as the Eurasian Economic Union; the Collective Security Treaty Organization; and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). Due to space considerations, we cannot analyze Moscow-Astana relations in depth, but they include strong trade and defense ties (joint military exercises and Astana regularly purchases Russian military technology).

As for Sino-Kazakh relations, the two countries are both members of the aforementioned SCO and, more importantly, Kazakhstan, again, due to its geographic location, is in the middle of China’s grandiose One Belt One Road Initiative (OBOR, also known as the “New Silk Road”), which seeks to (re)connect the Asian giant with Europe through a network of roads and railways via Central Asia and Russia; and through a series of ports in the South China Sea and the Indian Ocean. As part of this grandiose project, a Chinese company is constructing a massive “dry port,” the Khorgos Gateway, in Kazakhstan.

Geography and Foreign Policy
The link between geography and foreign policy has been well-researched – see for example Tim Marshall’s Prisoners of Geography: Ten Maps That Explain Everything About the World or the works of Halford MacKinder– but we should stress that it is not solely global powers like China, Russia or the U.S., but also other nations, including regional powers like Kazakhstan, that mold their foreign policy by their geographical location in the world.

After all, it is difficult to foresee a staunch pro-Washington government in the middle of Central Asia, with Beijing and Moscow as direct neighbors. An extreme scenario was proposed in a January 2018 report by the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), a think tank in Washington DC, which hypothesized reasons why Russia could militarily intervene in Kazakhstan – comparisons were made to the situation in Crimea – perhaps not by coincidence, the report was published at the same time President Nazarbayev visited Washington. Certainly, closer Washington-Astana diplomatic or military relations would be a big red flag for Moscow; though suggesting a Russian military operation in Kazakhstan seems unnecessarily alarmist. Likewise, the Kazakh government does not want to put Chinese investment at risk by supporting Washington policies that Beijing disagrees with.

Thus, the Kazakh government has to walk a fine diplomatic line regarding what it can realistically achieve at the foreign policy level, not because of lack of resources or will, but rather because of possible issues with two of its neighbors.
As a final point, it is worth noting that a January 2018 article in the New York Times noted the battle for influence between Beijing and Moscow due to OBOR, hinting at how Astana “has tried since independence in 1991 to stay on good terms with Russia but has also steadily eroded Moscow’s once overwhelmingly dominant position in the region by expanding ties with China.” Similarly, a commentary in the Huffington Post on Kazakh-Russian relations also explains why Kazakhstan cannot distance itself too much from Moscow, because doing so would risk a possible Crimea-type situation, akin to what the AEI muses, and because Russian military assistance helps President Nazarbayev’s own “anti-Islamist campaigns” at home. While the word “geography” is not flat out mentioned, it is certainly implied.

The Trump-Nazarbayev meeting was heralded as a diplomatic victory for Kazakhstan, and it will be certainly interesting to see how far bilateral relations will go. However, as this commentary has sought to explain, Kazakh foreign policy ambitions will be tempered by the country’s geographic location, namely having the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China as immediate neighbors.

In spite of the evolution of diplomacy and the metaphorical shrinking of the world due to technological advancements that facilitate faster communication and transportation, in 2018 geography continues to matter and will certainly continue to influence foreign policy.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect those of any institutions with which the author is associated, nor those of Geopoliticalmonitor.com.