Showing posts with label tourism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tourism. Show all posts

Sunday, June 7, 2026

Modern Diplomacy: "Ankara-Tashkent relations: What’s the next milestone?"

 



 "Ankara-Tashkent relations: What’s the next milestone?"

Wilder Alejandro Sanchez and Marin Ekstrom

6 June 2026

Modern Diplomacy

Published: https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2026/06/06/ankara-tashkent-relations-whats-the-next-milestone/ 

 How far integration will go between Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Türkiye, and Uzbekistan is debatable. 

 

The Organization of Turkic States (OTS) recently held a summit focused on “Artificial Intelligence and Digital Development.” While the May 15 meeting itself did not offer any groundbreaking resolutions, all five heads of the OTS member states participated and reaffirmed their commitment to greater cooperation and integration. This summit was just one example in a series of events that demonstrate growing unity and collaboration among the Turkic states.

How far integration will go between Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Türkiye, and Uzbekistan is debatable. There are several regional initiatives that are bringing these countries, as well as other states across the Caucasus and Central Asia, together, including connectivity projects such as the Middle Corridor and the Uzbek-Kyrgyz-Chinese railway, as well as agencies such as the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and the Eurasian Economic Union.

 

Wednesday, October 29, 2025

Modern Diplomacy: "Japan and South Korea: Vital partners in the New Uzbekistan"

 

 

 

"Japan and South Korea: Vital partners in the New Uzbekistan"

Wilder Alejandro Sanchez and Marin Ekstrom

Modern Diplomacy

28 October 2025

Published: https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2025/10/29/japan-and-south-korea-vital-partners-in-the-new-uzbekistan/

Uzbekistan has recently commenced construction of a new airport in Tashkent, valued at $2.5 billion, as a symbol of the country’s reinvention.

 

Uzbekistan has recently commenced construction of a new airport in Tashkent, valued at $2.5 billion, as a symbol of the country’s reinvention. The project, slated to begin operations in 2029, aims to serve as Central Asia’s key aviation hub by supporting more than 40 take-offs and landings per hour and serving 20 million passengers annually. Economists predict that increased air traffic at the airport could generate $27 billion in annual revenue and create thousands of new jobs.

To achieve this ambitious goal, Tokyo and Seoul will be critical partners: Japan’s Sojitz Corporation, which has extensive experience in the aviation sector, has agreed to invest millions of dollars and share technical expertise. As for South Korea, the Incheon International Airport Corporation (IIAC) signed a $24.5 million consulting contract to provide operational and service support for the development of the new Tashkent airport.

 

Wednesday, January 1, 2020

Interviewed for: "Curaçao: Choppy Waters"

"Curaçao: Choppy Waters"
By: Al Emid
Global Finance
December 9, 2019
Originally published: https://www.gfmag.com/magazine/december-2019/curacao-choppy-waters

Curaçao enjoys income from multiple sources but is buffeted by troubles spilling out of Venezuela.

Curaçao boasts an oil industry, a sizable tourism sector and status as a corporate tax haven. Yet the island nation, an autonomous country within the Kingdom of the Netherlands, is under severe economic pressure—partially due to the political crisis and economic collapse in Venezuela, its close neighbor to the south.

Atop the list of problems: Isla Curaçao, the state-owned oil refinery, needs a new operator. The current contract with Petroleos de Venezuela runs out at the end of 2019. In December, PDVSA won a temporary extension of its contract to last up to one year while the refinery continues looking for a new operator.

While the refinery had received an exemption from US sanctions on Venezuela, production has dwindled drastically due to lack of crude from Venezuela, says Wilder Alejandro Sanchez, a Peru-based analyst who follows Curaçao.



Continue Reading...

Thursday, October 12, 2017

IWP Presentation: Russia-Latin America and Caribbean Relations in 2017


You are cordially invited to a lecture on the topic of 
Russia-Latin America and Caribbean Relations in 2017 
with
Alex Sanchez
International Affairs Analyst, IWP Alumnus
Wednesday, October 11th
5:00 PM 
The Institute of World Politics
1521 16th Street NW
Washington, D.C.

About the lecture:
This presentation will discuss current relations between the Russian Federation and Latin American and Caribbean states. Apart from addressing Moscow’s relations with “the usual suspects” (e.g. Cuba and Venezuela), we will also explore initiatives with other regional states at the diplomatic, defense and economic level. We will conclude by discussing whether the Russian government currently has an overall strategy towards Latin America and the Caribbean and what new initiatives we can expect in the near future.
About the speaker:
W. Alejandro Sanchez is an international affairs analyst who focuses on geopolitical and defense issues in the Western Hemisphere. A member of the Forum on the Arms Trade, he is a regular contributor to IHS Jane's Defense Weekly, the Center for International Maritime Security, Living in Peru, among others. His analyses have appeared in journals including Small Wars and Insurgencies, Defence Studies, the Journal of Slavic Military Studies, European Security, Studies in Conflict and Terrorismand Perspectivas. He received his B.A. from Ursinus College, his M.A. from American University, his Certificate on Caribbean Defense and Security from the National Defense University (Washington, DC) and his Certificate on International Politics from the Institute of World Politics.
The views expressed in this presentation are the sole responsibility of the presenter and do not necessarily reflect those of any institutions with which the presenter is associated.

Saturday, December 20, 2014

VOXXI: Improving U.S.-Cuba relations: Bad for the Dominican Republic’s tourism industry?


"Improving U.S.-Cuba Relations: Bad for the Dominican Republic's Tourism Industry"
W. Alejandro Sanchez
VOXXI
December 19, 2014
Originally published: http://voxxi.com/2014/12/us-cuba-dominican-republics-tourism/


The world continues to analyze and ponder the future of U.S.-Cuba relations following President Obama’s landmark decision to seek the normalization of relations with the Caribbean state. However, there is another factor to keep in mind: how will improved U.S.-Cuba relations and the now realistic possibility that the embargo will be lifted in the near future affect the Caribbean and, in particular, the Dominican Republic?
By focusing on the present and futures status of Caribbean tourism, one could argue that a Washington-Havana rapprochement may not be beneficial for everyone.

Bad for tourism?

The State Department has published a fact sheet of the key points of President Obama’s December 17 speech. One section discusses an expansion of travel to the island, stating that U.S. travelers will now be able to go to Cuba for family visits; journalistic activities; professional research and professional meetings; educational activities; public performances, clinics, workshops, athletic and other competitions; and exhibitions, among others.
To phrase this another way, there are now more options that U.S. citizens can use to travel to Cuba. Simply travelling to the island for tourist purposes is still an issue, but we can expect to see more U.S. colleges open study-abroad programs in the island (for the record, several universities already have them, including American University).
The issue here is that Americans will now want to take their dollars to spend in exotic Cuba, instead of visiting other Caribbean states. After President Obama gave his speech, the news website Dominicantoday.com posted a short story which argued that the changes between Washington and Havana “will likely affect Dominican Republic in sensitive economic areas such as tourism, as local industry leaders have for years cautioned that a Washington-Havana thaw would surely siphon off the number of visitors to the Caribbean’s biggest economy.”
The aforementioned article does not mention which “local industry leaders” have warned about this possibility, but this issue does deserve greater discussion.

Facts and the future

The Dominican Republic and Cuba were the two major beneficiaries of tourism in the Caribbean throughout most of 2014. According to a December report by the Caribbean Tourism Organization, some 4.2 million tourists traveled to the Dominican Republic between January and October, while Cuba received 2.2 million between January and September. Jamaica comes at a slightly distant third place with 1.7 million.
These numbers make Cuba and the DR adversaries, as they are the two major destinations for tourists (i.e. Americans, Canadians or Europeans). Nevertheless, a 2005 study on Caribbean tourism muses that when the status quo changes between the U.S. and Cuba it is feasible to foresee a dramatic change in the U.S. market which “will change the rules of the game of Caribbean tourism.”
Given President Obama’s recent speech, it does seem like the rules of the game are about to change. The Dominican Republic’s newspaper Diario Libreexplains how companies like the cruise line Carnival Corp., the discount airline JetBlue and even Orbitz are now ready for the embargo to be fully lifted in order to begin offering deals for American tourists to travel to Cuba. What this means regarding revenue loss for the Dominican Republic remains to be seen.
It is worth highlighting that it is not just the possibility of Cuba opening for business that may threaten tourism to the DR in the near future. Other Caribbean states are also receiving more visitors; case in point is Haiti, which received over 362 thousand tourists in the first nine months of 2014 – this is a 21% increase from the same period in 2013. Likewise, Venezuela is turning to its Caribbean beaches in order to jumpstart its flagging economy. Hence, while Cuba is the DR’s major tourism adversary, we should not forget other nations that are also promoting tourism to enrich their coffers.
As a final point, it is important to remember that if American tourists choose to visit Cuba instead of the DR (whenever the embargo is lifted) this will not be solely because of the chance to visit an exotic location like Cuba, which has been closed to Americans for decades – although this is an obvious reason. If tourism to the DR were to decrease, it would be also because of internal issues that the DR government has yet to fix, such as citizen insecurity.
As we continue to discuss the future of U.S.-Cuba relations after December 17, it is similarly important to keep in mind what this rapprochement will mean for the Caribbean region. The effect of closer U.S.-Cuba relations on tourism to the Dominican Republic may not have an obvious connection at first sight, but if the embargo is lifted and Americans do begin pouring into Cuba, the coffers of the various Caribbean states that depend on tourism revenue, including the DR, will take a big hit.

Wednesday, April 9, 2014

VOXXI: Can Spain solve Puerto Rico’s financial crisis?


Can Spain solve Puerto Rico's financial crisis?
W. Alejandro Sanchez
VOXXI
April 9, 2014
Originally published: http://voxxi.com/2014/04/09/spain-help-puerto-rico-financial-crisis/


Puerto Rico is courting Spain in what could be the Caribbean island’s first decisive step towards financial recovery as it has experienced almost a decade of financial crisis. The government in San Juan aims to become a sort of “investment bridge” between Spain and the U.S. by capitalizing on the island’s history of pharmaceutical production, as well as other industries such as banking and computer technology.
This is a bold move by the administration of Governor Alejandro Padilla. If successful, it could stop the “brain drain” of young educated Puerto Ricans who have chosen to migrate to the U.S., Spain or Latin America in search of better livelihood.
Puerto Rico Courts Madrid
Governor Padilla has intended to increase ties with Madrid over the past year. This was best exemplified by his trip to Spain on June 2013 with an entourage that included Alberto Baco, Secretary of Economic Development and Commerce, as well as Antonio Medina, Director of the Compañia de Fomento Industrial (PRIDCO).
The goal was to get the attention of Spanish and other European industries to theisland’s pharmaceutical industry.
Puerto Rico historically has had a strong industry of biosciences. It is estimated that 18% of pharmaceutical products in the U.S. are manufactured in Puerto Rico, such as Lipitor, Norvasc and Zocor.
A group of Spanish industrialists returned the favor and visited the Caribbean island this past February as part of a workshop ambitiously entitled: “Puerto Rico: Gateway to the United States Biotechnology Market.” The delegation was made up of representatives of Spanish companies such as CRB Inverbio, Health in Code and MGM Integrated Solutions.
The aforementioned Medina, director of PRIDCO, highlighted that “Puerto Rico has a history of over 50 years in the pharmaceutical industry, which has evolved and expanded into other industries” such as biotechnology.
An April 6 report by the Spanish news agency EFE summarizes Padilla’s new strategy: internationalize the island’s economy and create a platform for foreign firms that would like to export their services to the U.S. and for local companies who wish to break into the European market. (In other words, San Juan would become the proverbial middle man).
So far, it seems that San Juan has had limited success at bringing investment from Madrid.
The aforementioned EFE article explains how trade between Puerto Rico and Spain is “sparse” and the island exported $875 million USD worth of Spanish goods in 2012.
Plan B for Puerto Rico: Tourism
While the Padilla government aims to increase investment opportunities with Spain, he may have to rely on the well-tested tourism sector as a Plan B for short-term income.
This upcoming May a new Air Europa route will start between San Juan and Madrid. This could bring a significant increase of Spanish tourists, and their wallets, to the island for the summer 2014 tourist season.Ingrid Rivera, Puerto Rico’s Minister of Tourism, believes that this air route could bring up to 28 million euros to the island.
Moreover, Puerto Rico participated in the late January 2014 International Tourism Fair, which was held Madrid. Additionally, Puerto Rico will earmark as much as two million USD for a marketing campaign to attract more European tourists to the island.
There is also the hope that Iberia could once again restore flights to Puerto Rico. Due to financial problems the airline stopped flights to San Juan in early 2013.
Short Term Solutions?
Puerto Rico’s financial credibility has been hurt due to its $70 billion USD debt. Hence, analysts and scholars continuously compare the island to European nations in financial trouble.
In fact, the renowned Dr. Howard Wiarda from the University of Georgia wrote a commentary in which he argues that “uncertainty over the status issue [with the U.S.] makes it more difficult for Puerto Rico to renegotiate its large debts, while its inability to pay reinforces the notion […] that the island […] cannot govern themselves.” (Wiarda, “Puerto Rico: A Caribbean Greece?” March 2014).
Finally, this past January 28, the Center for International Security Studies hosted a conference with Dr. Jose Villamil, a Puerto Rican economist and Chairman & CEO of Estudios Tecnicos, a financial consulting firm in Puerto Rico.
During the Question & Answer section, I asked Villamil how the Puerto Rican government could stop the aforementioned brain drain of young educated individuals, who make up the cornerstone of any country’s workforce.
Villamil acknowledged that it is a major problem. One of his suggestions for a short term solution is investment in construction. He clarified that he did not mean ongoing large projects in the island such as a proposed train and the extension of a major expressway.
Villamil explained to the audience that he meant small infrastructure projects that can be built very quickly, particularly on the Western part of the island which is more undeveloped.
Nevertheless, he stressed that construction will not solve the island’s long term problems; this is just one short term solution.
Initiatives such as an alliance with Spain over pharmaceuticals, increasing tourism and short-term construction projects demonstrate how Puerto Rico has several options regarding how to jumpstart its economy. Hopefully one of them will work.

Wednesday, March 19, 2014

VOXXI: Nudity and vandalism challenge Peru’s tourism

Nudity and Vandalism Challenge Peru's Tourism
W. Alejandro Sanchez
VOXXI
March 19, 2014
Originally published: http://voxxi.com/2014/03/19/nudity-vandalism-challenge-peru-tourism/

Peru’s tourist sites are currently besieged by two major challenges. One of these sounds slightly amusing: “nude tourism,” which, as the name implies, constitutes taking a photo of yourself at a famous landmark while fully nude. Meanwhile, a more severe challenge in Peru’s Cuzco region is vandalism of historical landmarks.
A cornerstone of Peru’s booming economy is its tourism industry. According to recent statistics, over three million tourists traveled to Peru in 2013 to visit its wonders, from the ruins of the Inca Empire (such as the famous Machu Picchu Citadel) and pre-Inca cultures, to the country’s Amazon rainforest and major shopping areas in border cities like Tacna.

“Nude tourism”

The amusing side of Peru’s challenges regarding tourism will be to encourage foreigners to keep their clothes on when they visit historical sites.
This past March 12, four foreign tourists were arrested in two separate incidents as they were taking photographs of themselves nude in the Machu Picchu citadel. Two of the tourists were Canadians while the other two were Australians. According to reports, one of the Australian tourists tried to bribe a local security guard so that he would not notify the police. The attempted bribe was not successful.
The arrested tourists were taken to a police station in Machu Picchu, where the memory disks of their digital cameras were confiscated.
Three days later, on March 15, four more tourists, all Americans, were also arrested for taking photos of themselves naked at Machu Picchu. While these individuals were not successful in snapping a nude photo at the famous Inca ruins, others have in fact succeeded.
In response to this growing wave of unwanted nudity in a historical location, Cuzco’s regional director of culture, Ricardo Ruiz Caro, has announced that park guards will increase surveillance to “avoid these unfortunate events that threaten cultural heritage”.

Cracking down on vandalism

However, “nude tourism” is not the only problem that Peru is facing nowadays. A more serious issue is criminals defacing important cultural landmarks.
At 3:26am on Sunday, March 9, a security camera recorded an unidentified man  spray painting  the letters “JHK” on Cuzco’s famous “twelve angle stone,” in the city’s center. The twelve angle stone has been a usual hotspot for tourists for decades (I visited Cuzco and the stone as a child). Local authorities have very carefully removed the spray paint from the stone.
Tragically, other historical locations in Cuzco have also fallen victim to vandalism. In early March, unknown individuals spray painted a wall of a famous Inca town known as Ollantaytambo. Days later, on March 15, a Peruvian citizen and a Norwegian tourist were arrested when they were panting a house that was constructed during Peru’s colonial era.
Major historical sites around Cuzco have guards and security cameras, but they have proven to be largely ineffective, as exemplified by the aforementioned incidents. Besides the obvious necessity for more guards, what is needed is a desire among the Peruvian population to protect the country’s heritage, instead of destroying it.

Tourism: Cornerstone of the economy

While Peru’s economy centers on its mining and agricultural industries, tourism is also a vital sector that has allowed the Andean nation to increase not only its revenues but also its international image.
Recent statistics demonstrate that Peru’s ongoing stability and development encourage foreigners to visit the country’s cultural and natural wonders. This past December, Carlos Canales, President of Peru’s National Chamber of Tourism, declared that tourism in Peru had increased by 12% in 2013 as compared to 2012, which translates to 3.25 million tourists who visited the Andean country.
Canales explained that 1.2 million individuals carried out “border tourism,” namely entering Peru’s border cities to shop or visit the region. One prime destination is Peru’s southern city of Tacna, which is regularly visited by Chilean citizens.
Most tourists visiting Peru come from Chile, the U.S., Brazil, Spain, Argentina and Ecuador.
Nevertheless, like in any part of the world, attracting tourists from abroad is heavily reliant on internal security. Reports of violence and insecurity easily dissuade foreigners from visiting tourist destinations, and the local population will suffer from the loss of foreigners that come to spend their savings.
An example of this occurred in late 2013 when protests started in Peru’s southern region of Puno. Local authorities explain that because of the civil unrest, around 1,500 tourists cancelled their trips to the area. Puno’s Directorate of External Commerce and Tourism argues that the area lost some 250 thousandnuevos soles (around 88 thousand US dollars).
While “nude tourism” can be regarded as a victimless crime, Peruvians are proud and protective of their cultural heritage, especially anything related to the Incas. Moreover, from a more practical level, tourism is a huge industry for Peru and a vital source of revenue for Peruvians living in tourist hotspots. Unsurprisingly, running around nude in Machu Picchu or spray painting the twelve angle stone in Cuzco has been widely reported on by the local media as it is an offense to the Andean country’s proud history.

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Containment in Their Shanty Towns is not a Solution: Constructive Engagement and not a Face-off between Gangs and New Jamaican Prime Minister is Neede

by Research Fellow Alex Sanchez
12 Dec 2007
Council on Hemispheric Affairs
http://www.coha.org/containment-in-their-shanty-towns-is-not-a-solution-constructive-engagement-and-not-a-face-off-between-gangs-and-new-jamaican-prime-minister-is-needed/

    • Jamaica should be a paradise not just for tourists, but also for day-to-day citizens trying to live out their lives

    • London’s behavior towards its former colony based on deporting Jamaican criminals back to overcrowded Kingston jails does not do the job

    • How much of the violence in Jamaica is gang-related and how much is politically-motivated?

    • Jamaica does not need “chameleon” politics; it needs leadership

After three months in power, Jamaican Prime Minister Bruce Golding has his work cut out for him regarding national security issues, and the time for action is at hand. The proliferation of gang warfare is a growing cancer on the island, which, combined with corruption, political violence and common crime, creates a deadly pathological social cocktail that inevitably will prevent the nation from achieving its rightful place as a Caribbean leader. If some dramatic anti-crime and corruption program is not implemented in short order, the island’s stature will undoubtedly deteriorate, leaving regional competitor Trinidad-Tobago in a much more favorable status within the Caribbean Community (Caricom) and the local tourist industry suffering from grievous injury. More and more, Jamaica is being alluded to for its punishing problems with crime and not as an island in the sun. The two factors simply cannot coexist.

Past Jamaican governments have been successful at confining the gang problem to ghettos and shantytowns. This, however, does not mean that a solution had been found; it simply means that it was made to seem invisible, going mostly unseen by the well-off Jamaicans and, most importantly, by the thousands of tourists that pour into the island annually. Tourism is a critical part of the country’s economy; Tourism Minister Edmund Bartlett recently declared to the Jamaican American Chamber of Commerce that in 2006, the island attracted three million visitors and “cleared” $2 billion in revenue.

This is where the situation gets complicated; Kingston has attempted a policy of “containment” vis-à-vis its gangs, both regarding a very limited number of political crimes as well as the action of much more common apolitical street gangs, making their leaders de facto chieftains of skidding neighborhoods and tattered communities, as long as they do not hassle the tourists. The situation is slowly worsening, and while gang rumbles have not saturated the island’s tourist resorts (which could very well prove disastrous to the industry in the very near future) they are apparently unstoppable. Solving this growing epidemic will be Golding’s critical mission for his term in office. Jamaica may be a Caribbean paradise, but even in paradise there are deadly snakes and never has a potential victim been more vulnerable.

Golding Takes Charge
Bruce Golding ended the 18 years of rule by the People’s National Party (PNP) and by becoming Jamaica’s prime minister after being sworn in several months ago. He has been labeled a “chameleon” because of his shifting political ideology during the late 1990s. Until 1995, Golding was an important figure in the Jamaica Labor Party (JLP), which was then controlled by Edward Seaga. Disagreements with Seaga prompted Golding to leave the JLP to form his own party, the National Democratic Movement (NDM). Golding’s aim was to have a third party as an alternative to Jamaica’s traditional two-party system and as a personal vehicle for his political ambitions. However, the NDM failed to gain what he thought of as the necessary popularity and Golding left the party that he had helped found and returned to the JLP in 2002.

It seems Golding’s most recent change of heart proved the right one for his own political ambitions as he did eventually win the seat of Prime Minister. Furthermore, the JLP managed to achieve a slight legislative majority in the elections by gaining 33 seats in the 60-seat House of Representatives. The island’s traditional ruling party, the PNP gained the other 27.

Among the members of Golding’s 18-seat Cabinet are Dorothy Lightbourne, attorney-general and minister of justice, and Derrick Smith, minister of national security. Golding himself will hold the minister of defense position. The previous government had a 14-member Cabinet, and there has been persistent criticism that Golding is unnecessarily and expensively growing the government, including appointing ministers without portfolio.

According to the Caribbean Media Corporation (CMC), in one of his first decisions as prime minister, Golding, responding to various small caliber accusations involving various forays of complicity involving the country’s police and constabulary, “called for the establishment of a single independent body that will investigate all cases of abuse and unlawful conduct by members of the security forces in Jamaica.”

The Jamaican Constabulary Force (JCF)
When he declared the necessity of creating an oversight institution for Jamaica’s security forces, Golding declared that “the government will do everything possible to strengthen and support the police in combating crime and in the lawful execution of their duties. However, this cannot be at the expense of the constitutional rights of the people.” It is unclear if such statements prompted the resignation on October 10 of Police Commissioner Lucius Thomas (as well as the head of the Jamaican Defense Forces, Rear Admiral Hardley Lewin). Golding accepted the resignation of both officers, even though Thomas gave no reason for his decision.

The magnitude of the problem is illustrated by events like that of June of this year when, in an effort to more effectively monitor crime on the island, the Jamaican government hired the British-based company Mason Communications Ltd. to install closed-circuit TV cameras at strategic spots across the island. Then Security Minister Peter Phillips said the cameras would be installed both in high-crime areas such as rural Clarendon parish, as well as the relatively crime-free resort cities of Montego Bay and Ocho Rios along the north coast. So far, it is unclear if the cameras have proven entirely effective in thwarting crime.

The reality of the situation is that the JCF is ill-equipped to handle the rising wave of violence. In 2005, the Jamaican police called for a wage increase, arguing that their monthly salary of $415 for a starting officer was not worth the risks they took daily. In addition, the badge of a JCF constable does not inspire any great amount of respect among gangs, not even enough to avoid routine attacks against the force. For example, in December 2006, a group of constables were on patrol in a vehicle in the community of Salt Spring. Their vehicle was shot at by unidentified gunmen, wounding three policemen. Due to attacks such as this one, the government has resorted to dispatching the Jamaican defense force as part of internal security operations, along with the regular police.

Don’t Hurt the Tourists

At the beginning of the year, as violence spread throughout the island, particularly in St. James Parish, the government made the decision to regularly deploy troops as well as police officers to a number of locations, including St. James, home of the world-renowned Montego Bay resort, which reportedly receives over one million visitors a year and is traditionally Jamaica’s most popular tourist destination. The deployment followed a January 2007 shootout in Montego Bay between police officers and gang members that left five dead. In addition, St. James Parish was one of the most violent areas in Jamaica during 2006, with a record 178 homicides, including the unsolved murder of an Australian national who was found slain in his hotel room at the resort.

It is evident that Kingston is very concerned over protecting its lucrative tourism industry, even if this means leaving neighborhood ghettos at the mercy of high levels of violence, as these areas do not receive the police attention they otherwise would deserve. Tourist resorts and communities populated by well-off Jamaicans are traditionally the areas that feature strong security. If Golding is true to his word about combating crime in Jamaica, he knows very well where the criminals are—not in the resorts but in the shanty towns. Sending security forces to protect tourists does not protect the general Jamaican population that Golding was elected to serve.

Gang Warfare or Political Violence?
The Western part of the capital city of Kingston, including neighborhoods like Trenchtown, have experienced the most violence of the entire island. Statistics indicate that in 2005 there were 1,671 homicides in Jamaica, an island of 2.8 million. The JCF says that overall homicides this year are up 12% and they are up 9% compared to last year. Of course, these statistics only reflect the crimes that are actually reported to the JCF, one can only imagine how much violence occurs that is not reported, and therefore not counted in statistics. A September 12 Associated Press article by Ben Fox explains that the “police estimate that about half the killings involve Jamaica’s numerous gangs. A small number are thought to be attacks and counterattacks by supporters of the country’s two main political factions […] in the late 1970s and 1980s politicians encouraged and some say armed Kingston street gangs to intimidate opponents and rustle up votes. Hundreds of people were killed as a result.”

Political violence is a huge overlapping issue: as early as July of this year, as the country was looking forward to the elections, there were a number of incidents in the community of Mountain View Avenue. One of these included shots fired at Joan Gordon-Welby the JLP candidate to the area. In a separate incident, Sanjay Ebanks, campaign manager for Welby, died of two gunshot wounds in Kingston’s St. Andrew South Eastern district.

Later, in September, there were widespread attacks throughout the island that claimed a number of lives. According to reports, in one attack, four people were shot in Georges Valley. Another three people were murdered in the neighborhood of Mountain View Avenue in Kingston. The violence prompted a meeting between the public ombudsman Bishop Herro Blair and electoral officials; however the voting went on as planned.

Police blame much of the island’s gun violence on street gangs who fight for control of the lucrative drug and extortion trade. The island is a major transshipment point for South American drugs. In 2004, there were a number of gun fights across Spanish Town, particularly after gang leader Oliver Smith was killed by unknown gunmen. The next year was a particularly bloody one for Jamaica; in May of that year, the violence became so widespread that business owners closed their shops for an afternoon across Kingston as a way to protest the government’s ineffectiveness in controlling gang fights. In June 2007, the Jamaican police declared that a dispute between rival gangs led to the death of George Grant. Apparently, the man was tortured (fish hooks were found in his mouth), before he was beheaded, with his head being found in a bag.

It’s Not Always Good to be Back Home
What to do with the Jamaican deportees that are sent back to the island has been a matter of grave concern to policymakers in Kingston for a long time. In June 2006, then-National Security Minister Stephen Philipps traveled to London to discuss with British authorities about the fate of Jamaican deportees being sent from the U.K. to its former colony. Philipps declared “among the issues that were raised by us included ways in assisting the re-induction of persons being deported into Jamaican society, where we do training programs and the like.”

According to a December 6, 2006 report published by the CMC, “the majority of the 5,101 Caribbean nationals sent back to the region between the period 1 October 2005 and 22 October 2006 had criminal convictions. Jamaica received 1,364 deportees, Haiti 743, Trinidad & Tobago 298 and Guyana 244.” Grenada’s ambassador to Washington, Denis Antoine, was quoted as saying “you [the U.S.] get trained people, but you send back unwanted criminal deportees.” He then added “we are saying that it hurts, because it hurts. Their intention is not to hurt us, we hope, but then if you are our friends and neighbors, please pay attention to it, that’s what we are asking.” Another December 2006 report by the CMC explains that, according to U.S. Department of Homeland Security, more than 36,000 persons were deported to the Caribbean between 1998 and 2005; some 11,455 were sent to Jamaica.

Showing the other side of the coin regarding Kingston’s interest in the scope of the deportee efforts, former minister Philipps was quoted, in a March 2007 New York Times article, as saying “we have intelligence that many of these criminal deportees come back and are at the center of some of the criminal organizations here, […] in an ideal world, I wouldn’t accept any deportee […] but I acknowledge our obligations under international law.’”

Criminal offenses among the deportees are based on drug-related charges and bank robbery; however it is unclear how big the correlation is between the rise in crime in Jamaica and the influx of deportees. An April 2007 article by cracking investigative journalist Rory Carroll in the influential British daily The Guardian, explains that “many of the drug offenders are not gangsters, but ‘mules,’ such as Pauline Jackson, 45, a large, softly-spoken mother of five from a Kingston slum who was offered £2,500 to smuggle 41 cocaine pellets through Gatwick.”

Gang violence was instigated in the 1970s and 1980s by the islands’ political parties. Increased crime statistics in recent years may simply have to do with the government’s inability to train its security forces and give them the necessary equipment to control gangs.

If anything, the Jamaican deportees are individuals who put yet another burden on an island known for having a weak economy, and being overly dependent on tourism. In addition, it creates strain and resentment from the part of Jamaican authorities who are receiving these “unwanted guests” from nations that they consider their friends, meaning the U.S. and the U.K. At a time when Jamaica has become a hub for the transshipment of illegal South American drugs, Washington is not following a coherent policy. By forcibly sending back individuals who, due to the poverty in the island, could eventually join some gang or become involved in drug trade as ‘mules,’ including formerly incarcerated Jamaicans found guilty in the U.S. and who have served hard time in the U.S. jails, Washington is guaranteeing that there will be a new generation of sophisticated criminals who will be able to take over the leadership of local Jamaican gangs.

Common Friends?
In order to assume his new position and duties, Golding took an oath before Sir Kenneth Hall, Governor General of Jamaica. Six thousand people attended the ceremony, many from overseas, which exemplifies Jamaica’s continued relationship with the United Kingdom. The Governor General is the representative of the British monarch to Jamaica and holds reserve powers in case of emergency. Jamaica’s relationship to the United Kingdom is that of two states that to an extent share a common history. For example, both are members of the Commonwealth of nations.

In the spirit of these historical ties, London has provided Kingston with considerable aid on security matters. In June, the Jamaican government hired Justin Felice, formerly of the Northern Ireland Police Service, to lead an anti-corruption unit in the Jamaican Constabulary Forces. Among other Britons taken on to provide leadership and skills to the Jamaican security forces is Mark Shields, a famed former Scotland Yard detective.

However, there is another side to London’s security issues vis-à-vis Jamaica, shared by other countries like the U.S. and Canada. This issue is the deportation of Jamaican criminals from local communities abroad (particularly the U.K., U.S. and Canada) back to the island. A November 23, 2007 article in the Canadian daily The Toronto Star explains that more than 33,000 deportees have been returned to Jamaica in the past fifteen years. The article by Sandro Contenta explains that “between 2001 and 2004, Jamaica absorbed 2,700 deportees a year from the U.S., Britain and Canada – a huge influx, given that Jamaica’s entire prison population in 2003 was only 4,744.” The article provides a good analysis on the conflicting reports about who really are the deportees. The common perception is that the deportees are criminals who, after they are returned to the island, continue their illicit activities.

Other analysts argue that only a fraction of deportees are hardened criminals, and others are merely mal-adjusted individuals who are jolted both from being forced to be suddenly separated from their families, as well as being forced to return to their native country where they are often stigmatized as criminals. Contenta explains that “the average age of deportees was 35, placing them in an age group less likely to re-offend. And 81 per cent of people deported to Jamaica were convicted of non-violent crimes, including immigration-related matters, fraud and drugs.”

An October 27 Press Association Newsfile article reports that British Prime Minister Gordon Brown is seeking to draft a new policy regarding the thousands of expatriate prisoners in the U.K. prisons, including a large number of Jamaican nationals. The article explains that “many of the Jamaican inmates are female drug “mules,” caught smuggling illegal substances into Britain. Any repatriation deals could therefore have a significant impact on the local drug market, by potentially encouraging smugglers to target the UK in the knowledge that mules could be sent straight home.” Director of the Howard League for Penal Reform Frances Crook, said “there should be an element of discretion when repatriation is considered […] Many of these couriers, particularly women, were forced into smuggling drugs by Jamaican gangs and are now housed in jails thousands of miles from their families and loved ones. An agreement with Jamaica would hopefully see many of them returned to that country, something that most would welcome.” There are around 1,400 Jamaican prisoners currently in U.K. cells.

Declarations vs. Results
Prime Minister Golding has said that “corruption in Jamaica is much too easy. It is too risk-free [...] public officials will be impeached and removed from office if they are found guilty of corruption.” He has also told the AP that he: “[gets] angry sometimes when I look at the capacity that we have, the resources that we have, the opportunities that we have had and how little use we have made of them.”

Jamaica cannot reach its potential unless its numerous security issues have been solved, not simply contained. Gang violence, whether politically motivated or, more likely drug related, is part of the daily life that has, for a long time, been successfully contained to poor neighborhoods of the island, far from the tourist beaches and resorts. The containment wall is now being battered down and the tongues of violence are reaching the tourists and engulfing them, forcing the Jamaican government to recognize that it has a nationwide gang problem of immense implications for the nation’s political and economic consequences. Jamaica’s new Prime Minister, Bruce Golding has the position to transform Jamaica into a paradise, not just for tourists but for ordinary Jamaicans as well. Unfortunately, this is not an automatic process.