La empresa de comunicaciones Orbit presentó su antena OceanTRx4 Mil en la exposición Sea Air Space a comienzos de abril. Zona Militar conversó con Asaf Punis,
vicepresidente de Marketing Global y Desarrollo de Negocios de Orbit,
sobre por qué la Armada de los Estados Unidos y otros servicios navales
deberían interesarse en su antena de comunicaciones satelitales (SATCOM)
Ocean.
"Orbit looks for customers in the US for SATCOM antennas:
The communications company Orbit displayed its OceanTRrx4 Mil antenna
at the Sea Air Space in early April. Zona Militar spoke with Asaf
Punis, Orbit’s Vice President for Global Marketing and Business
Development, about why the US Navy and other naval services should be
interested in their Ocean satellite communications (SATCOM) antenna.
In late March, the U.S. Navy cruiser USS Normandy (CG 60) and the Guyanese patrol vessel Shahoud carried out joint exercises
in Guyana’s exclusive economic zone and international waters.
Washington has many allies and partners across the Greater Caribbean,
particularly among the region’s English-speaking nations. Despite having
limited budgets and assets, the defense forces of the English-speaking
Caribbean are training and increasing their capabilities to carry out
missions, which aligns with US diplomatic and military objectives.
Unmanned
surface vessels (USVs) are sailing full steam ahead, as evidenced by
their (deadly) efficiency in attacks by the Ukrainian armed forces
against Russian targets across the Black Sea. Though the security
landscape in Europe is dramatically different from that of the Western
Hemisphere, new technologies are always of interest to any armed service
and USVs should be no exception. Whether USVs have a future in Latin
America and the Caribbean merits deeper exploration.
The
program is joined by Wilder Alejandro Sanchez, an analyst and
researcher of Latin American security. The discussion covers some of his
recent writing and maritime security in Latin America.
Alejandro has been featured in a wide range of publications including
Jane’s, Breaking Defense, and Shepherd Media. Sanchez writes the CIMSEC
column “Southern Tide” focused on maritime security in the Caribbean and
Latin America, and he is the president and founder of Second Floor
Strategies. He is a non-resident senior associate at the Americas
Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
At the end of March, Argentina’s minister of defense flew aboard a C-130 Hercules aircraft over
Argentina’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) to monitor firsthand
international distant-water fishing vessels potentially involved in
illegal, unreported, or unregulated (IUU) fishing in the country’s
waters. Across Latin America, navies and coast guards are the first line
of defense to combat this crime.
While
the Caribbean Sea is currently not as dangerous as the Black Sea or the
Red Sea, from combating drug trafficking and illegal fishing to
humanitarian assistance/disaster relief operations to a belligerent
Nicolas Maduro regime in Venezuela, Caribbean naval forces have many
daily missions and priorities. The United States, via US Southern
Command and the US Coast Guard, and the armed forces of France, the
Netherlands, and the United Kingdom – which have overseas territories
across the Caribbean – are all present across Caribbean waters and are
critical partners of regional defense forces.
This
commentary briefly summarizes the joint military Caribbean exercises
scheduled for 2024 and other recent high-level meetings to understand
the concrete actions regional armed forces are carrying out to tackle
the region’s threats and challenges.
Written by Wilder Alejandro Sanchez, The Southern Tide addresses
maritime security issues throughout Latin America and the Caribbean. It
discusses the challenges regional navies face including limited defense
budgets, inter-state tensions, and transnational crimes. It also
examines how these challenges influence current and future defense
strategies, platform acquisitions, and relations with global powers.
“Whether
[working] against COVID, transnational criminal organizations, the
predatory actions of China, the malign influence of Russia, or natural
disasters, there’s nothing we cannot overcome or achieve through an
integrated response with our interagency allies and partners.” –General Laura J. Richardson, Commander, U.S. Southern Command
In a speech to commemorate the service’s sea day (Día de la Fuerza de Mar) on August 21,Uruguayan Navy Captain Daniel Di Bono
stated, “Starting today, it is time to start writing another page of
this story. Ours, [the story] of the older ones, those of the Frigates,
the Minesweepers, the [marine research vessel] Vanguardia, is already
coming to an end. The period of modern, agile, and flexible ocean patrol
vessels, coastal patrol vessels, and scientific vessels is
approaching.”
Navies
constantly evolve due to new challenges, objectives, visions, and
realities. However, analysts rarely witness a sharp evolution of a Navy
and its fleet. The Uruguayan Navy is undergoing that process, and as a
reliable U.S. ally, Washington needs to understand what is going on and
why.
The summer blockbuster movie, The Meg 2: The Trench,
focuses on prehistoric sharks, among other sea creatures, battling
against Jonas, portrayed by Jason Statham, and his friends. A side plot
of the movie concerns a particularly topical issue in the real world:
seabed mining.
International
diplomacy is composed of an endless list of treaties, agreements,
memoranda of understanding, among other types of documents between
states. As events unfold and national interests and objectives shift,
many of these treaties become obsolete, forgotten or replaced by new
treaties. One document that is in the edge of becoming obsolete is the
Inter-American Reciprocal Assistance Treaty (Tratado Inter-Americano de Asistencia Recíproca: TIAR), commonly known as the Rio Treaty.
Written by Wilder Alejandro Sanchez, The Southern Tide addresses
maritime security issues throughout Latin America and the Caribbean. It
discusses the challenges regional navies face including limited defense
budgets, inter-state tensions, and transnational crimes. It also
examines how these challenges influence current and future defense
strategies, platform acquisitions, and relations with global powers.
“We
focus on partnerships…Our partners want to work with us. They want the
advantage of the United States education, training, exercises and
military equipment. It’s the best in the world. And so it’s up to us to
deliver that in a way that’s relevant and also provides a return on
investment for American taxpayer. So that is our focus.” –Navy Adm.
Craig S. Faller, commander of U.S. Southern Command, before the Senate Armed Services Committee July 9, 2019.
By Wilder Alejandro Sanchez
Introduction
A deployment by the U.S. Coast Guard cutter Stone (WMSL-758) to the South Atlantic, and two coast guard patrol vesselsdonated by the Korea Coast Guard (KCG)
to the Ecuadorian Navy, are some of the latest initiatives by South
America’s partners to help regional navies combat illegal, unreported,
and unregulated (IUU) fishing. As large, extra-hemispheric fishing
fleets continue to actively operate close to South American waters,
often crossing into the Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) of regional
states, navies require additional ships and the physical presence of
partner navies to combat these crimes. In the vast waters of the South
Pacific and South Atlantic, every ship counts.
The Southern Tide Written by W. Alejandro Sanchez, The Southern Tide addresses
maritime security issues throughout Latin America and the Caribbean. It
discusses the challenges regional navies face including limited defense
budgets, inter-state tensions, and transnational crimes. It also
examines how these challenges influence current and future defense
strategies, platform acquisitions, and relations with global powers.
“The
security environment in Latin America and the Caribbean is
characterized by complex, diverse, and non-traditional challenges to
U.S. interests.” Admiral Kurt W. Tidd, Commander, U.S. Southern Command,
before the 114th Congress Senate Armed Services Committee, 10 March 2016. By W. Alejandro Sanchez
The first two phases of the multinational, Caribbean-focused military exercise Tradewinds 2018 took place between 4-21 June. Said maneuvers, sponsored by U.S. Southern Command (SOUTHCOM),
brought together an estimated 1,700 troops from almost two dozen
nations. Given the ongoing maritime security challenges that the Greater
Caribbean continues to face, these confidence and
interoperability-building exercises continue to be very important.
Tradewinds ‘18 The first two phases of Tradewinds 2018 took place in Saint Kitts and Nevis
and then in The Bahamas. Phase III, a seminar among regional leaders to
discuss the results of the first two phases, occured from 17-19 July in
Miami, Florida. The participating nations included the majority of
Caribbean states, in addition to Canada, Mexico, the U.S. and
extra-hemispheric states like France, the Netherlands, and the United
Kingdom.
Some of the platforms that were deployed include the U.S. Coast Guard Cutter Charles David Jr. (WPC-1107); the British RFA Mounts Bay(L3008), a Bay-class auxiliary landing ship dock; Canada’s HMCS Shawinigan (MM 704), a Kingston-class coastal defense vessel; and Mexico’s ARM Oaxaca (PO 161), an Oaxaca-class
patrol vessel. As for aerial platforms, these included AS365N3 Panther
and UH-60 Blackhawk helicopters. As SOUTHCOM explains “this year’s focus
is on countering transnational organized crime in the region,” apart
from other priorities like improving disaster response. Operations at
sea including procedures to intercept a non-compliant vessel, and live
firing exercises with deck-mounted weapon systems like .50 caliber
machine guns and 25 mm cannon.
In
general, Caribbean governments and security forces have generally had a
positive attitude toward these maneuvers. For example, Prime Minister of St. Kitts and Nevis and Minister of National Security the Honourable Dr. Timothy Harrisreportedly
stated “I have been assured that we can therefore expect training
components or injects that reflect real world scenarios so that in the
face of a real threat, our security forces and emergency response
personnel will be able to coordinate seamlessly and in a manner and time
that both meet international standards.” Similarly, Christian J.
Ehrlich, an external analyst at the Strategic Research Institute of the
Mexican Navy (Instituto de Investigaciones Estratégicas de la Armada de México), explained to the author that Tradewinds will help improve interoperability between regional navies and coast guards.
Caribbean Threats The
Caribbean’s maritime security challenges are very diverse. They include
drug trafficking (Washington’s primary concern), weapons and human
trafficking, illegal fishing, not to mention search and rescue
operations. These crimes have been extensively recorded, but it is worth
noting that some occurred, somewhat ironically, at the same time that
Tradewinds was taking place. For example, in mid-June Her Majesty’s Bahamian Ship (HMBS) Durward Knowles, a patrol vessel,
intercepted a 50-ft Dominican fishing vessel that was poaching in
Bahamian waters. Around the same time, the Dominican Republic chased a
speedboat until it stopped in the coast of Pedernales province. Aboard
were 351 packets which
apparently contained cocaine. A month earlier, in early May, it was the
Jamaican Defense Force’s turn to catch a vessel at sea, as a ship
reportedly intercepted off the coast of Westmoreland had “764.9 pounds of compressed marijuana.”
Even more, piracy is becoming a noteworthy problem: in 2017 the organization Oceans Beyond Piracy (OBP)
“recorded 71 incidents in Latin America and the Caribbean. Most
incidents in the region occurred in territorial waters, with anchored
yachts being the primary targets for attackers.” There were also 16
attacks against tankers and three fishing vessels, among other types of
ships. A map prepared by OBPshows
a cluster of incidents off the coast of Belize, Colombia, Venezuela as
well around the islands of Grenada, Saint Lucia, and Saint Vincent and
the Grenadines.
Not counted in the report was a late-April 2018 incident
along the Guyanese-Surinamese border, where pirates attacked a group of
four fishing boats, robbing the crew and killing several of them.
The Status of Caribbean Maritime Forces Some
Caribbean defense forces have attempted to upgrade and expand their
maritime fleets in order to take better control of their exclusive
economic zone (EEZ). For example, the Royal Bahamas Defense Force (RBDF)
has cquired several vessels constructed by Damen Shipyard via the Sandy Bottom Project.
These include Damen Stan 3007 and Stan Patrol 4207 patrol vessels as
well as one Stan Lander 5612 auxiliary transport, roll on-roll off
vessel. Similarly in 2016 the Jamaican Defense Force(JDF) upgraded its fleet by receiving two new Stan Patrol 4207 from Damen in 2017.That same year, the JDF received two 38-foot SAFE boats and two 37-foot Boston Whaler vessels, donated by the U.S. More recently, in late July 2018, the Barbados Coast Guard commissioned patrol boat Endurance, a 958Y inshore vessel donated by China earlier this year.
The ambitious Sandy Bottom Project notwithstanding, Caribbean defense
forces in general have limited defense budgets, hence new platforms,
aerial or maritime, are not acquired or modernized regularly. Moreover,
the aforementioned examples also highlight the continuous reliance on
extra-regional allies for donations in order to expand the naval
inventory of these defense forces.
Mr.
Ehrlich mentions that greater regional cooperation and interoperability
is needed in order to make up for a limited number of platforms and
personnel, and in order to decrease the region’s dependence on SOUTHCOM
and the U.S. Coast Guard. The Mexican Navy could step up its presence in
the Caribbean to help its partners with maritime security, but
unfortunately the Mexican Navy seems to be more focused on its Pacific
territory.
As
a final point, it is important to highlight the troubling scandals
regarding regional defense officers that are caught in cahoots with
criminals. For example, Colonel Rafael Collado Ureña of the Dominican Republic’s Army,
was arrested in mid-2017 in Puerto Rico as he was about to carry out a
sale of 12.9 kilograms of cocaine. Around the same time, a member of the
Jamaican Defense Force was arrested at Kingston airport as he tried to
board a flight to Toronto with 2.8 kilograms of cocaine.
Final Thoughts Exercise
Tradewinds 2018 recently concluded, and hopefully the maneuvers and
training exercises that Caribbean forces carried out with counterparts
such as those from Canada, Mexico, the UK, and the U.S, will be helpful
for their future patrol and interdiction operations in their respective
EEZs. We can also hope that these ongoing exercises, as well as
generally cordial regional diplomatic, trade and defense relations, will
lead to greater interoperability between regional forces.
While
Tradewinds 2018 can be regarded as a success, these maneuvers will have
limited positive impact if Caribbean defense forces do not obtain
additional funding for new aerial and naval platforms given the size of
the Caribbean Sea. Even more, scandals among security personnel, namely
their involvement in criminal activities, stain the reputation of
regional defense forces and limit the success of any training
operations.
Wilder
Alejandro Sanchez is a researcher who focuses on geopolitical, military
and cyber security issues in the Western Hemisphere. Follow him on
Twitter: @W_Alex_Sanchez.
The
views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and do
not necessarily reflect those of any institutions with which the author
is associated.
here is an ongoing debate in Washington about the U.S. defense budget and the future of U.S. military operations around the world, whether it is President Donald Trump questioning NATO or operations in Afghanistan, Iraq or other places.
Another pillar of U.S. military presence around the world are Foreign
Military Training (FMT) programs with partner nations. In this
commentary we will briefly discuss this initiative with a focus on
partnerships between the U.S. and its Latin American allies.
FMTs and LatAm
The U.S. State Department, in co-operation with the Defense
Department publishes every operation that falls under FMT programs
between the U.S. and Latin America, titled “Foreign Military Training
and DoD Engagement Activities of Interest” (click here for the 2016-2017 version).
Two key FMT programs are International Military Education and Training
(IMET) and the Combating Terrorism Fellowship Program (CTFP). The U.S.
enjoys cordial relations with most Latin American and Caribbean nations
which primarily fall under the jurisdiction of Southern Command (SOUTHCOM).
The latest FMT report outlines the plethora of initiatives the U.S.
carries out with its partners, including bringing Latin American
military and police personnel to the U.S. for training at the Army War
College, the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation, the
Inter-American Air Forces Academy, the Coast Guard Training Center, the
Aviation School at Columbus Air Force Base, the Naval Postgraduate
School at Monterey, among several other institutions.
The training programs carried out are similarly varied, like for
example: aircraft electrician and avionic mechanic programs with
Colombia; basic army intelligence and naval intelligence courses with
the Dominican Republic; NCO professional development training with El
Salvador; and courses on countering transnational threats and basic
psychological operations with Honduras, just to name a few programs.
Exercises and Partnerships
It is worth noting that U.S. military agencies regularly conduct
major training exercises with their Latin American partners which do not
fall under the category of FMT programs, but they do serve to promote
better interoperability between different military forces. Case in
point, multinational naval exercises like UNITAS or PANAMAX help U.S.
naval platforms train with platforms and personnel from allied navies.
For example, for UNITAS 2017, which took place in Peru, the U.S. Navy
deployed USS Somerset (LPD 25), USS Chafee (DDG 90) and USCGC Escanaba
(WMEC 907), as well as U.S. Marines – for UNITAS Amphibious 2017, which
also took place in Peru – to train alongside regional partners including
Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Peru; and extra regional allies like Spain
and the United Kingdom.
Finally, SOUTHCOM is part of the U.S. National Guard’s State Partnership Program (SPP), via which “17 U.S. states, Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia
have active partnerships with defense and security forces from 23
nations in the Caribbean, Central America and South America.” For
example, Louisiana NG carries out initiatives with Belize; Massachusetts
NG partners with Paraguay; South Carolina NG teams up with Colombia;
and West Virginia NG partners with Peru. Initiatives carried out under
the SPP umbrella include Colombian army officers attending a live-fire artillery exercise at McCrady Training Center in November 2017; or personnel from South Dakota NG working alongside Surinamese troops to renovate parts of the O.S. Majosteeg 3 School in Paramaribo last August 2017.
There is a veritable plethora of scholarly work about the
effectiveness (or lack thereof) of U.S. FMT programs – a cursory online
search shows insightful analyses in War on the Rocks, The Nation, Truth-Out,
among many others. However, most of these commentaries focus on Africa,
the Middle East and specific countries like Afghanistan and Iraq. This
is understandable, as the U.S. is particularly active in these regions
and states nowadays. The problem is that the conclusions and lessons
learned from these case studies should not be generalized.
Furthermore, assessing the effectiveness and need for FMT programs
and training exercises is complicated: on the one hand, it is important
for the U.S. to keep close defense relations with allies and partners by
training military and police officers, particularly if it doesn’t, other global powers, like China, may step in to fill in the void. On the other hand, the U.S. military cannot, and should
not, be so involved in another country to the point that it is
effectively constructing or reforming its armed forces. Even more, it is
impossible to see the effects of these training initiatives until after
they occur: will U.S.-trained military offices use what they have
learned for the good of the country or will they carry out their own
coups?
Generally speaking, U.S. training of Latin American armed forces has a
negative connotation, as it brings up memories of regional military
officers carrying out coups and human rights abuses during the Cold War –
such as General Hugo Banzer Suarez of Bolivia, who attended the School of the Americas (now known as WHINSEC) in 1956 and carried out a coup in 1971.
Then again, a former U.S. special forces interviewed by the author
who has trained various armed forces, including from Latin America,
pointed out that “it is impossible to know if in three, five or 10
years, someone that we trained will attempt to carry out a coup.”
Moreover, it is important to note that present-day hemispheric armed
forces do not require the start-from-the-bottom approach that the U.S.
has taken elsewhere. That is a point in favor of continuing ongoing FMT
programs and other partnerships.
Even more, Latin America’s security problems,
particularly drug trafficking, are a direct problem for the U.S. as
drugs make their way from the South to the U.S. market, which supports
the argument of ongoing strong engagement in the region.
A final issue is, as other articles have discussed, whether the U.S.
is trying to train too many armed forces around the globe. The
aforementioned operator acknowledges that, “we are doing too much in too
many countries…the U.S. doesn’t need it.” The problem is that most
Latin American governments enjoy cordial relations with the U.S. and
would actually want more defense and security assistance
in order to face threats like drug trafficking, narco-cartels and
insurgencies. “I trained various Latin American armies and I never felt
any animosity towards myself for being a gringo,” the operator said.
Indeed, a retired senior army officer from South America interviewed by
the author, similarly mentioned that greater U.S. military involvement
would be ideal – the Cold War legacy notwithstanding. Therefore, the
question is reaching that delicate balance in which the U.S. military
helps partner nations, but it does not do “so much” to the point that it
becomes too involved in said country’s internal affairs.
Discussing what should be the future of FMTs and other partnership
programs is complicated. Overall there seems to be a general consensus
that the U.S. military is trying to do “too much” in certain countries,
to the point that it is counter-productive. Even more, any time that a
U.S.-trained military officer carries out human rights abuses or
attempted coups, this adds fuel to the argument that the U.S. should
withdraw from nation-building or army-building altogether.
Ongoing diplomatic issues notwithstanding, U.S.-Latin America defense
relations nowadays are arguably at their highest, as Washington does
not face any credible security threats from the region, and most armed
forces would welcome greater U.S. military involvement to address mutual
security threats. The geopolitics and security situation in Latin
America cannot be compared to that of Africa, the Middle East or Asia.
Thus, an eventual reform of FMT and partnership programs should not be
done hastily.
The
views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and do
not necessarily reflect those of any institutions with which the author
is associated.
Written by W. Alejandro Sanchez, The Southern Tide addresses
maritime security issues throughout Latin America and the Caribbean. It
discusses the challenges regional navies face including limited defense
budgets, inter-state tensions, and transnational crimes. It also
examines how these challenges influence current and future defense
strategies, platform acquisitions, and relations with global powers.
“The
security environment in Latin America and the Caribbean is
characterized by complex, diverse, and non-traditional challenges to
U.S. interests.” Admiral Kurt W. Tidd, Commander, U.S. Southern Command,
before the 114th Congress Senate Armed Services Committee, 10 March 2016.
By W. Alejandro Sanchez
U.S. Southern Command (SOUTHCOM), which oversees most of Latin America and the Caribbean, has released its 2018 Posture Statement as its commander, Admiral Kurt W. Tidd, testified before the Senate Armed Forces Committee of the 115th
U.S. Congress on 15 February. In this commentary, we will discuss some
of the major points brought up by the Statement regarding maritime
security issues in the Western Hemisphere.
SOUTHCOM as a Low Priority
“…
the combined impacts of defense spending caps, nine years of continuing
resolutions, and insufficient spending in the diplomacy and development
arenas make it increasingly difficult to sustain this regional network.
Because our global security responsibilities outpace the resources
available to meet them, we have had to make a series of tough choices,
resulting in compounding second and third order effects. The net result
is the perception among our friends—and the palpable anticipation among
our competitors—that we no longer stand by our commitments, that we are
relinquishing our strategic position, and that we don’t take the
challenges in this region seriously.” –Admiral Kurt Tidd
Past Posture Statements have, in very straightforward manners, declared that SOUTHCOM is the lowest priority of theCombatant Commands (COCOMs) (see the 2015 Posture Statement),
thus it receives limited resources. Part of the reason for this
situation is that most Latin American and Caribbean nations that fall
under SOUTHCOM’s area of responsibility have close and cordial
diplomatic relations with the U.S. Moreover, the countries that are at
odds with Washington do not pose a traditional military threat to U.S.
national security. In
other words, since most governments have good relations with
Washington, and the few countries that do not are not going attack the
U.S. anytime soon (if ever at all), then there is little reason to
assign significant numbers of assets and platforms to SOUTHCOM. Thus,
the concern is that, regional allies may interpret this situation as
Washington no longer being interested in supporting their own security
problems, which include transnational challenges like drug trafficking.
SOUTHCOM’s lack of naval platforms is an example of this situation and
potential perception.
It will be interesting to see if the Fiscal 2019 defense budget proposed by the Trump administration, which requests USD$686.1 billion,
will trickle down to SOUTHCOM, though this seems unlikely given other
U.S. military operations elsewhere on the globe. Nevertheless, a 12 December, 2017 story in the Navy Timesreports that SOUTHCOM will receive “Littoral Combat Ship and Spearhead-class expeditionary fast transport vessels,” which will be of great help for counter-narcotics and assistance operations. The USCG
“I’d
like to go on record to express my strong support for the U.S. Coast
Guard’s efforts to recapitalize its fleet, especially its medium
endurance cutters, which directly support JIATF South-led interdiction
operations. As I have stated repeatedly, without U.S. Coast Guard
cutters, USSOUTHCOM would have virtually no afloat maritime
forces.” –Admiral Kurt Tidd
SOUTHCOM’s naval component, U.S. Naval Forces Southern Command/Fourth Fleet, relies on platforms that are temporarily assigned. For example, aircraft carrier USS George Washington(CVN-73) participated in the 2015 UNITAS exercises, while USS Somerset (LPD 25), USS Chafee (DDG 90) and USCGC Escanaba (WMEC 907) participated in 2017 UNITAS. SOUTHCOM does occasionally get assigned surface platforms, especially Oliver Hazard Perry-class
frigates prior to their decommissioning, which are deployed to patrol
Caribbean waters to combat maritime crimes, particularly drug
trafficking, as well as the hospital ship USNS Comfort.
With
that said, the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) is arguably the cornerstone
enabler of SOUTHCOM maritime operations, particularly as employed by
Joint Inter Agency Task Force South (JIATF-S) in the Greater Caribbean
region. Indeed, there is a regular stream of reports about drug
smuggling vessels being successfully interdicted by USCG platforms, like
USCGC Tahoma (WMEC 908), which successfully interdicted over 1,800 kilograms of cocaine during
a two-month tour in 2017. USCG platforms have also carried out
humanitarian assistance in the Caribbean region, including,
interestingly, in Nicaragua – via USCGC Northland(WMEC-904) in early 2018.
The LCS and SOUTHCOM
“I’d
also like to express my unqualified support for the Littoral Combat
Ship (LCS), which we can leverage for multiple mission sets, including
D&M, SOF support, partner nation capacity building, and potentially
HA/DR response and medical engagements…My view is that the sooner we can
deploy these ships in theater, the greater the impact we can have on
interdicting the flow of illicit drugs into our country.”–Admiral Kurt
Tidd
Admiral
Tidd’s support for the LCS program is not surprising since, as
previously mentioned, a number of them will hopefully be deployed to
SOUTHCOM this year to help combat maritime crimes. The US Navy has
reportedly decided not to re-activate its Perry-class frigates to support SOUTHCOM operations, thus all eyes are on the LCS and the Spearhead-class vessels for these operations.
Medical Diplomacy and HA/DR
“From
a goodwill and engagement perspective, operational funding for the
Navy’s hospital ship COMFORT has been a proven game-changer for
USSOUTHCOM. We ask for the COMFORT every other year, but the Navy has
been unable to source its employment due to the ship’s maintenance
challenges.”
“We
are working to transition future iterations of UNITAS from a
traditional scripted exercise to an actual humanitarian assistance and
disaster response (HA/DR) capable force that can exercise at sea against
real world, unscripted missions.” –Admiral Kurt Tidd
As previously mentioned, USNS Comfort (T-AH-20) has participated in several HA/DR operations in the Western Hemisphere in recent years. As the author explains in a 16 January commentary for CIMSEC, “Comfort
was deployed to Puerto Rico to assist those in need after Hurricane
Maria hit the island. The vessel also traveled to Haiti after the 2010
earthquake to assist with the relief and support efforts as part of
Operation Unified Response.” The platform has also operated in
initiatives like Partnership for the Americas and Operation Continuing
Promise.
It
could be argued that Comfort should be permanently assigned to Fourth
Fleet so that it could be deployed more regularly to the region, but
logistics, the ship’s age, and the fact that there is only one other
hospital ship in the fleet, USNS Mercy (T-AH-19), make this highly unlikely.
It is worth noting that after Hurricane Matthew hit Haiti in 2016, Comfort was not deployed to the Caribbean island, but rather USS Iwo Jima (LHD-7) and USS Mesa Verde
(LPD-19), which provided humanitarian relief. Given recurring natural
disasters, the general lack of inter-state warfare (maritime or not) in
the region, and not being able to deploy the Comfort with much
regularity, it makes sense that future multinational naval exercises,
such as UNITAS, focus on disaster response so that regional countries
can also provide relief services quickly when the next disaster occurs. China and Russia
“China,
Russia, and Iran are courting some of our most strategically important
Latin American and Caribbean partners and supporting authoritarian,
anti-American regimes.”
“Expanded
port and logistics access in Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela provide
Russia with persistent, pernicious presence, including more frequent
maritime intelligence collection and visible force projection in the
Western Hemisphere.”
“China’s
commercial and diplomatic advances move it closer to its larger
strategic goal of reshaping global economic and governance
architectures… Increased reach to key global access points like Panama
create commercial and security vulnerabilities for the United
States…”–Admiral Kurt Tidd
China
and Russia’s presence in Latin American and Caribbean waters is quite
limited. The most significant deployment, in terms of numbers, occurred
in 2008, when a small Russian fleet traveled to Caribbean waters to
carry out military exercises with Venezuela – some of the vessels
included “nuclear-powered Peter the Great cruiser and anti-submarine warship Admiral Chebanenko.” Nevertheless there have been some recent incidents, like in 2017, when intelligence ship Viktor Leonovdocked in Havana, Cuba, and also traversed international waters off the East Coast of the U.S.
Meanwhile, China is known in the region for the 2011 and 2015 deployment of its hospital ship Peace Ark (866 Daishan Dao), a Type 920 hospital vessel. There have also been sporadic visits of Chinese warships to the region, like the 2013 visit to Argentina, Brazil and Chileof destroyer Lanzhou, frigate Liuzhou and supply ship Boyanghu.
It
is conceivable that, in a more challenging scenario, Chinese warships
could be invited by Latin American and Caribbean states to participate
in naval exercises in the region, particularly as most of them have
diplomatic relations with the People’s Republic of China, not the
Republic of China (ROC/Taiwan). The Posture Statement’s reference to the
Panama Canal is likely tied to the fact that the government of Panama
switched from having relations with Taiwan to China in 2017.
Maritime Crime
“Criminal
networks move drugs and engage in a wide array of illegal activity,
including weapons trafficking, chemical importation, poppy and coca
cultivation, fentanyl smuggling, and illegal mining.”
“Naval
Special Operations Forces in Guatemala, El Salvador, and Panama are now
among the most competent and responsive counternarcotic (CN) units in
Central America, integrating with air assets, effectively responding to
JIATF South “cues,” and executing numerous joint and individual
interdiction operations”
“We
also supported our partners in the Dominican Republic to improve
maritime interdiction in the Caribbean through the establishment of a
Joint Task Force that combined SOF-trained CN units with Dominican naval
aircraft.”
“We
see great opportunity to build on the multinational cooperation that
characterizes these international interdiction efforts, especially the
successful inter-institutional coordination of last year’s Operation
KRAKEN, in which the United States, Colombia, Panama, and Costa Rica
targeted illicit maritime pathways in the Central American
littorals.”–Admiral Kurt Tidd
Over the past year, U.S. platforms, whether from the Navy or Coast Guard, have successfully interdicted several vessels in Caribbean waters carrying narcotics. Additionally,
U.S. allies in Central America and the Caribbean are modernizing and
expanding their naval forces. Fortunately, they have also enjoyed
successes, for example the naval force of El Salvador’s seizure of over 700kg of cocaine aboard a suspicious vessel in January 2018.
Certainly,
and tragically, these accomplishments are only slowing down the flow of
drugs from south to north, as production continues in the former and
there is still a market for drugs in the latter. The successes of
SOUTHCOM and its regional allies against drug trafficking must go
hand-in-hand with more comprehensive strategies to address this problem. Final Thoughts
“We
seek to mobilize and organize the unique strengths of each of our
partners and Allies, to expand information sharing and collaboration,
and to align security, development, and capacity building activities
that allow us to translate short-term successes into long-term gains,
sustained by an adaptive and inclusive regional security
network.”–Admiral Kurt Tidd
In
spite of being the lowest priority COCOM, SOUTHCOM has achieved various
successes in maritime security in recent years, including a plethora of
successful interdictions of suspicious vessels that were transporting
contraband, particularly drugs. Humanitarian missions via USNS Comfort and other vessels are also a great achievement toward strengthening relations with regional states and exercising soft power.
SOUTHCOM
benefits from the fact that most Latin American and Caribbean nations
have cordial relations with the U.S. and would actually welcome greater
U.S. defense assistance. Obviously, SOUTHCOM cannot do everything
itself, hence it is important for it to promote the professionalism and
modernization of the naval forces of partner nations. (While this
commentary has focused on SOUTHCOM’s operations, other branches of the
U.S. government, namely the State Department, should continue to work
together with this COCOM to promote U.S. national interests in a region
full of U.S. partners.)
SOUTHCOM’s
2018 Posture Statement demonstrates that while the U.S. continues to
enjoy a network of allies in the Western Hemisphere, there are plenty of
clear and present dangers and concerns that warrant greater support
from Washington for this region.
W.
Alejandro Sanchez is a researcher who focuses on geopolitical,
military, and cyber security issues in the Western Hemisphere. Follow
him on Twitter: @W_Alex_Sanchez. The
views presented in this essay are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of any institutions with which the
author is associated.
Written by Wilder Alejandro Sanchez, The Southern Tide addresses maritime security issues throughout Latin America and the Caribbean. It discusses the challenges regional navies face including limited defense budgets, inter-state tensions, and transnational crimes. It also examines how these challenges influence current and future defense strategies, platform acquisitions, and relations with global powers.
“The security environment in Latin America and the Caribbean is characterized by complex, diverse, and non-traditional challenges to U.S. interests.” Admiral Kurt W. Tidd, Commander, U.S. Southern Command, before the 114th Congress Senate Armed Services Committee, 10 March 2016.
By Alejandro Sanchez
In the past year a number of narco submarines have been seized in several Latin American states. Narco submarines continue to be a problem as hemispheric security forces combat drug trafficking. Unfortunately for every narco sub that is seized, another is under construction. While recent successful operations should be applauded, combating narco subs needs a regional strategy of its own.
In recent months, several narco submarines have been seized in various Latin American states. For example, on 5 August, Ecuadoran marines located one in the Las Delicias area, close to the border with Colombia. For Colombia, a narco sub was seized in an operation by army and naval personnel in the San Juan and Baudó Rivers in the Choco department in late July. The platform, which was carrying approximately four tons of cocaine, was apparently manufactured by ELN rebels. The Colombian Navy explained that this was the first time a narco sub was operating in a river, and that it probably took some five to six months to be constructed. Not long after, in mid-August, the Colombian Navy located yet another narco sub, this time in the Nariño department and with the capacity to transport up to four tons of drugs. This one measured 14 meters, with a diesel motor and propellers, the Navy explained in a communiqué.
Narco subs have also been located in Central America. For example, a narco sub, reportedly 16 meters in length and capable of transporting up to five tons of drugs, was found inGuatemala in mid-April. Months later, in late July, the Costa Rican Coast Guard found a similar illegal platform on a beach. Local authorities believe that the vessel, with the capacity to transport up to four tons of drugs, had a motor problem and was discarded by the crew, until it washed ashore and got stuck in the sand.
Catching Them At Sea
The aforementioned examples highlight one fact. So far, the vast majority of narco-platforms are captured in the mainland (meaning either on dry land or “docked” in some body of water), either before they depart or upon arriving to their destination.
As far as the author has been able to find, in the past couple of years, there have only been a couple of narco subs intercepted in open waters. One was in July 2015, when during a “joint operation, the U.S. Navy, U.S. Coast Guard, and assets from the Customs and Border Protection Office of Air and Marine, intercepted a “narco submarine” off the coast of El Salvador,”Business Insider explains. The platform was carrying over 16,000 pounds of cocaine.
More recently, in early September 2016, the U.S. Coast Guard Cutter Waesche intercepted a narco sub in the Pacific Ocean off the Central American coast. The Cutter reportedly launched two vessels and an armed helicopter in pursuit. U.S. personnel caught up with the sub, apprehended five suspects, and thwarted a scuttling attempt by pumping water out of the interior of the sub.” By preventing the sinking of the sub, the USCG seized more than 5,600 pounds of cocaine, with an estimated value of USD$73 million.
Who Finds The Narco Subs?
Nowadays, several Latin American and Caribbean navies and coast guards are undergoing a modernization process, which includes the acquisition of new platforms. For example,Colombia and Mexico are domestically manufacturing new fleets of patrol vessels. Christian Ehrlich, a director of intelligence for Riskop, a Mexican Strategic intelligence and risk control company explained to the author that the Mexican Navy is in the process of adding Damen Sigma 10514 frigates to its fleet, “this will provide a decisive boost to Mexico’s Maritime Domain Awareness but unfortunately it will be some time before this system has an acceptable operational level” (construction for the first of the new frigates commenced in mid-August). Meanwhile The Bahamas is in the final stretch of its ambitious Sandy Bottom Project, via which it is obtaining a fleet of different patrol boats from Damen Group. Similarly, in late June IHS Jane’s reported that Louisiana-based shipbuilder Metal Shark and Damen will construct near coastal patrol vessels (NCPVs) for regional U.S. partners like “the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Honduras, Costa Rica, Guatemala.” It is worth noting that Mr. Ehrlich, remarked how Mexico possesses aircraft like CASA CN—235 and Beechcraft King Air 350ER for ISR; Colombia also possesses similar assets.
Nevertheless, in spite of more modern navies and coast guards, locating narco subs at sea continues to be a problem. In an interview with the author, Gustavo Fallas, a journalist for the Costa Rican daily La Nacion, explained that “[Costa Rica] depends on the Americans to combat [narco submarines]. In 2006 we detained a submersible with three tons [of drugs] and it was thanks to an American frigate. In 2012 we chased another one in the Caribbean, and it was also after the Americans alerted us. For those reasons it is vital to have U.S. aid to locate these platforms.” Mr. Fallas added that Costa Rica must create a shield (meaning more vessels, radars, personnel) to prevent drug traffickers from using the country as a warehouse or transit path for drugs.
Unfortunately, Randy Pestana, a policy analyst at Florida International University’s Jack D. Gordon Institute for Public Policy, has a gloomy assessment about regional naval forces vis-à-vis narco subs. Mr. Pestana explained to the author how “relying on partner nations to stop, slow, or detain these shipments is difficult in itself as they do not have the necessary tools to do so unless provided by the U.S.” Of a similar opinion is Mr. Ehrlich, who stated to the author that “there isn’t a navy or coast guard in Central America with the [necessary platforms] to detect, follow and interdict [narco submarines].”
In other words, Central American navies will continue to rely on the U.S. (be it SOUTCHOM or the Coast Guard) to monitor maritime areas in order to combat, among other threats, narco submarines. This is problematic, since, as Mr. Pestana remarked, even U.S. security agencies have limits to their abilities, particularly nowadays when the U.S. has other security operations and geopolitical concerns around the globe. Furthermore, there is the problematic and ever-present red tape, namely, “the inability of the U.S. to respond to an identified narco submarine without permission from higher leadership. This often led to the narco submarine to either get away, or move out of the U.S. areas of operation,” the FIU expert explained.
How To Find A Narco Sub
Locating a narco submarine at sea is a tricky business. In an interview with the author, Mario Pedreros, a retired Chilean Naval officer and an expert in airborne maritime patrol, provided an excellent analysis on this problem.
As previously mentioned, the term narco submarine is commonly utilized for these vessels, however they are not really submarines. As Mr. Pedreros explains, these platforms are semi-submersibles, meaning that they cannot go completely underwater, and if they can do so, it is for brief periods of time. (“Narco submarine” is still a catchier name than “narco-semi-submersible” though). However, even if these vessels cannot fully dive, they are nonetheless difficult to locate at sea. Mr. Pedreros explained how some of these platforms have electronic motors, which makes them more silent than diesel engines, making them harder to find with passive sonar. “When it comes to semi-submersibles, utilizing sonar is not very efficient,” Mr. Pedreros concludes. Adding to the problem is that the vessel is pretty small, and “once at sea, the submersibles have 20 percent of their structure above the surface,” making them hard to pinpoint by radar.
Mr. Pedreros recommended maritime patrol aircraft (MPA) as an ideal tool to combat narco submarines at sea, as these aircraft possess superior sensors and radars for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance. Obviously, locating the target is only part of the solution, because then it has to be intercepted. “The aircraft must work with together with a vessel to capture the submersible. In other words, there are three components in this process: an aircraft (MPA), a vessel, and a light boat that can board the submersible and detain the crew,” the retired Chilean Naval officer explained. As previously discussed, various Latin American and Caribbean navies are acquiring OPVs with attached light boats, while Colombia and Mexico have platforms for maritime patrol, fulfilling the requirements by Mr. Pedreros; what is needed is greater multinational support, apart from additional platforms.
The Future of the Narco Sub
It would be naïve to assume that recent successful operations by regional security forces will convince drug traffickers to stop investing in narco submarines. There is simply too much money to be made in drugs, and the subs cost only around USD$1 million to manufacture. Even if five narco subs are stopped, drug traffickers only need one or two successful deliveries to make up for their losses.
Moreover, recently seized narco subs show they are becoming more technologically advanced, including bigger in size so they can transport greater quantities of contraband. The narco sub seized in mid-July in Choco had space for a crew of four, measured 9 meters in length by 4 wide, had radars, stabilizers, ballast weights and was powered by over 100 batteries, according to the Colombian daily El Colombiano.
Indeed, the (brief) history of narco subs shows a trend towards modernization, particularly as drug lords are always looking for new methods to transport drugs, from Cessna aircraft and go-fast boats during the Pablo Escobar era to drones and narco subs nowadays (though of course, narcos continue to utilize the former as well). Mr. Pestana drives this home remarking how “top drug traffickers are relatively smart and have a good grasp on technology and history.” Moreover, the attractive wages narco-organizations can afford to pay means that they can hire “former engineers or other trade workers,” as Mr. Pestana explains, to continuously improve previous designs.
Final Thoughts
From a scholarly point of view, the appearance of the narco sub is a fascinating development as it highlights drug traffickers’ ingenuity as they continuously think of new ways of transporting their contraband. Unfortunately, this represents an ongoing problem for regional security forces, as new narco subs become more technologically advanced. Unfortunately, even though many narco subs have been stopped, it only takes one successful trip to make a large profit.
In spite of several successful operations, combating narco submarines requires both a multiagency and multinational strategy of its own. Mr. Ehlrich stresses the necessity to disrupt the construction of these platforms (which requires cooperation between police and military units). As for when narco submarines are at sea, the Greater Central American region requires united front, such as a regional anti-narco submarine task force. By combining resources, in which member states can contribute platforms to create the three-platform interception teams that Mr. Pedreros described, this unit would ideally be more successful at locating narco subs at sea, and not just in inland waterways. This will decrease the region’s dependency on the U.S., which Mr. Pestana and Mr. Fallas highlighted.
Unfortunately, narco submarines are a problem that will not sink, hence new strategies are needed in order to combat them more efficiently.
Alejandro Sanchez Nieto is a researcher who focuses on geopolitical, military and cyber security issues in the Western Hemisphere. Follow him on Twitter: @W_Alex_Sanchez
The author would like to thank the various experts that contributed to this commentary:
Christian J. Ehrlich, Director of Intelligence, Riskop; External Analyst, Mexican Navy
Gustavo Fallas, Journalist, La Nacion (Costa Rica)
Mario Pedreros, a retired Chilean Navy Officer, expert in aero-maritime patrol. He participated as a Tactical Coordinator Officer (TACCO) in different missions overseas onboard Chilean Navy P-3 Orion aircrafts. Missions include Anti Submarine Warfare, Anti Surface Warfare, Anti Terrorism missions and Search and Rescue operations. He is currently based in Washington, DC. doing consulting for several Defense and Security companies.
Randy Pestana, Policy Analyst, Jack D. Gordon Institute for Public Policy, Florida International University
The views presented in this essay are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of any institutions with which the author is associated.