Showing posts with label saint kitts and nevis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label saint kitts and nevis. Show all posts

Monday, December 14, 2015

CIMSEC: Determining Success: TRADEWINDS 2015 and Lessons Learned


"Determining Success: TRADEWINDS 2015 and Lessons Learned"
W. Alejandro Sanchez
Center for International Maritime Security
October 7, 2015
Originally published: http://cimsec.org/determining-success-tradewinds-2015-lessons-learned/19026

Between May 31 and June 24 of this year, U.S. Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) carried out joint naval exercises with its partners in the Greater Caribbean. The annual exercises, known as TRADEWINDS, brought together units from over a dozen countries. Without a doubt, multinational military exercises are useful as the personnel involved in the maneuvers learn new techniques from each other as well as how to work together. Nevertheless, a major concern is how well the lessons learned are properly applied to real-world operations.
The Exercises
TRADEWINDS 2015, the 31st iteration of these month-long exercises, took place in two phases: first in Saint Kitts and Nevis and then in Belize. U.S military personnel trained with their counterparts from 18 other nations, including Grenada, Guyana, Haiti, nations from the Greater Caribbean, Mexico, and even overseas partners like the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the United Kingdom (which both have territories in the Caribbean).Caribbean multinational agencies also present included the Regional Security System (RSS), the Regional Intelligence Fusion Center (RIFC), and the CARICOM Implementation Agency for Crime and Security (IMPACS), among others. According toSOUTHCOM, the exercises were aimed at strengthening “the capacity of Caribbean nations to respond to natural disasters, humanitarian crises and counter transnational organized crime.”
There have been several reports that enumerate and explain the nature of the exercise. For example, off the coast of Belize, the navies from Belize, Mexico and the United Kingdom carried out a simulated vessel boarding, search, and seizure operation. Mexican naval personnel from the Mexican Navy ship ARM Independencia, travelling in an interceptor boat, boarded the British vessel theHMS Severn and “simulated [the] arrests of a group of merchant mariners who tried to resist.” Other exercises included crowd control, safety techniques like clearing buildings, and gunnery with a 50-caliber machine gun. A June 10 video posted in the Coast Guard Compass, the official blog of the U.S. Coast Guard, shows USCG personnel aboard a patrol boat from Grenada, explaining various techniques to their counterparts regarding how to understand the sea states and navigate effectively as they pursue a suspicious vessel.
In addition to praise from SOUTHCOM, the exercise has enjoyed the public endorsement and support from various Caribbean governments. For example ZIZ News, a Saint Kitts news agency, quoted Captain Kayode Sutton of the St. Kitts and Nevis Defence Force as saying, “the support from the government [in Basseterre] has been tremendous… Mr. Osbert DeSuza, the Permanent Secretary in the Office of the Prime Minister… visited the Exercise Control Centre and he received a brief as to what is going on for the entire exercise, the training, all the exercises that are going on right now.” Meanwhile, Guyana deployed its navy’s flagship, the GDFS Essequibo, to the exercise’s maritime phase, highlighting Georgetown’s commitment to display the best it has to offer to operate along its regional allies.
How to Determine Success?                                                    
During the TRADEWINDS 2015 opening ceremony in Saint Kitts,Lt. Col. Patrick E. Wallace, commander of the St. Kitts and Nevis Defense Force, declared, “I stress that the knowledge and skill that comes from this exercise is essential … However, just as important, is the strengthening of multi-national relationships." 
Making a multinational exercise successful so it can be properly applied in the real world includes coming up with realistic scenarios, as explained to this author by John Cope, a Senior Research Fellow at the Institute for National Strategic Studies at the National Defense University. He suggests that what’s needed are  “players (other than the US) had a major role in shaping the exercise scenario and the organization of the event so that the exercise emphasizes what they see as their needs rather than what the US/SOUTHCOM thinks are their needs, also the non-US players assume important positions in the structure of the exercise.”
A SOUTHCOM press release announcing the beginning of the exercises went over the two operational phases of TRADEWINDS 2015. But there is also a third phase, the “Key Leader Seminar,” designed to facilitate a discussion of the other phases and the way ahead. Ideally, a comprehensive report will be drafted regarding the lessons learned, as well as lessons that still need to be fully learned, from TRADEWINDS 2015. (In the interests of full-disclosure: in preparation for this commentary, I contacted SOUTHCOM for further information on the lessons learned aspect of TRADEWINDS 2015, but received no reply.)
Numerous military agencies, both U.S. and international, have published reports discussing how to properly adapt lessons learned from both exercises and operations. As the Establishing a Lessons Learned Program Handbook by the Center for Army Lessons Learned ponders, is a military organization “willing to openly discuss its mistakes, and is it willing to share those mistakes across organizational lines to make everyone better?” If not, it will be very difficult to implement an effective [Lessons Learned] program… The act of ‘saving face’ precludes individuals from admitting their mistakes.”
Hopefully phase 3 of TRADEWINDS 2015 included an open and honest discussion between representatives from the participating militaries, where there was not only praise for the event, but admitting, even if it was off the record, which areas they still need improving, in order to work in greater cohesion with the security forces of neighboring countries. Cope explains that, at least regarding the Caribbean, a base for institutionalizing operational and tactical procedures and processes that worked during an exercise may already be standard across various regional states. “Where CARICOM countries are struggling to perfect common approaches is in standardizing procedures for strategic and operational planning and strategic/political decision making. Their comprehensive disaster management process and experience with the Cricket World Cup have helped Caribbean countries, but leaders continually change.”
A PR Campaign?
Part of the problem may be simply a lack of a consistent PR campaign by regional navies (and security forces in general) to highlight the effectiveness of exercises. In other words, if a narco-speedboat is detained in the Caribbean by units of the U.S. and Jamaican coast guard services, it would be helpful if a subsequent press release could tie the hypothetical successful operation with lessons learned from TRADEWINDS. Another initiative would be to invite high-ranking government officials as well as journalists and other experts to the exercises as they take place, as this would help showcase the level of cooperation militaries from different states can achieve. This would have the added benefit of serving as a prime example to support similar exercises in the future.
At a time of budget constraints and with SOUTHCOM being the lowest-priority command center in the U.S. military, said agency needs to better demonstrate to Washington that its activities, including multinational exercises, are beneficial for both U.S. and regional security.
Concluding Thoughts
This discussion is not meant to question the validity of TRADEWINDS specifically, but rather to address multinational military exercises in general. The U.S. conducts quite a number of these in the Western Hemisphere, such as UNITAS, PANAMAX,Continuing Promise, and Beyond the Horizon/New Horizons.
Multinational exercises are important but a strong link has yet to be made between a successful naval exercise (i.e. in which units from two nations operate together to stop a suspicious vessel in the Caribbean), and whether the lessons learned from said simulation were successfully applied in the real world. Given the ongoing amounts of drug trafficking that flow through Caribbean waters, putting these lessons learned to the test would not be difficult.
Ultimately, SOUTHCOM is not lacking in exercises to increase its relations with regional allies in the Greater Caribbean and rest of Latin America; but it seems that the agency could do with a better PR campaign to explain how effective these exercises are in the long run.

Tuesday, April 9, 2013

VOXXI: Margaret Thatcher humiliated the Argentinian dictatorship


Margaret Thatcher Humiliated the Argentine Dictatorship
W. Alejandro Sanchez
VOXXI
April 8, 2013
Originally published: http://www.voxxi.com/margaret-thatcher-argentina-dictatorship/


The legacy of Margaret Thatcher in Latin America has a name: The Malvinas. And a big consequence: Due to the loss of the war, an already unpopular ruling military junta faced increasing criticism and pressure from the Argentine population and eventually returned the country to democratic rule in 1983.
The immediate effect in the Argentinian pride was enormous. The loss of the war is remembered today and the cry “Malvinas Argentina’s” is kept deep in the Argentinian minds.
The Argentinian Military Junta made the mistake to take by force the small Falkland’s to increase their popularity. The Iron Lady didn’t hesitate a minute to make the decision to go to war. And she won the respect of the Britons and gave the Argentinian the opportunity to finish with the military dictatorship.

Margaret Thatcher dead at 87

Former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher has died today at the age of 87 as one of the great political European leaders of XX century. The renowned “Iron Lady” was Prime Minister from May 1979 to November 1990, an impressive eleven and a half years in power.
It is a weird aspect of international affairs and world history that wars tend to be remembered more than other events. For example, throughout her tenure, some British territories in the Western Hemisphere achieved independence from London. Namely, Belize gained independence in 1981 while Saint Kitts and Nevis did the same in 1983.
But when it comes to Margaret Thatcher’s legacy towards the Western Hemisphere, she will not be remembered for these aforementioned developments, but rather for deploying British troops to fight the Argentine military in 1982 in the Falklands War.
The declassification of official documents has brought to light traits of Thatcher’s “iron” personality regarding the protection of the Falklands from Argentina. For example, she was at odds regarding with then-U.S. President Ronald Reagan, as she told the U.S. head of state “Britain had not lost precious lives in battle and sent an enormous task force to hand over the queen’s islands to a contact group.”
She was referring to the possibility of striking some kind of negotiated deal with Buenos Aires over the islands when it was clear that the British military were going to win the war. Unsurprisingly, the Argentine media has painted Margaret Thatcher in a somewhat different light, highlighting that she considered putting the disputed Falkland Islands under some kind of control by the United Nations.

Margaret Thatcher opened the door for democracy in Argentina

While Thatcher’s immediate goal in 1982 was to assure that Britain would retain control of the Falklands, the repercussions of her decision to deploy her country’s military had other effects. In London, such bold leadership helped her government improve its popularity among the population. But it is regarding Argentina that Thatcher had perhaps the most influence to open the door of democracy and the end of the cruel dictators.
The dispute over the Falklands islands has become a particularly sensitive issue in Argentina and part of that country’s national identity. The recent March 2013 referendum in which the inhabitants of the islands overwhelmingly voted to remain as a British overseas territory reopened an old wound in Argentina society (something that Argentine President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner was quick to capitalize on to increase her population). Hence, it is doubtful if the “Iron Lady” will be fondly remembered in that country. At the time of this writing, the websites of the Argentine presidency and the Argentine embassy in London have not yet uploaded any statements regarding Thatcher’s passing.
Thatcher went to war with the South American country to protect her citizens in the South Atlantic and ended up, indirectly, may have helped democracy return to Argentina. Maybe history down the road will remember her like that (though probably not by Argentine history textbooks).


Read more: http://www.voxxi.com/margaret-thatcher-argentina-dictatorship/#ixzz2Py37QpWT