Wednesday, August 6, 2014

VOXXI: Drought forces water rationing in Colombia


"Drought Forces Water Rationing in Colombia"
W. Alejandro Sanchez
VOXXI
August 6, 2014
Originally published: http://voxxi.com/2014/08/06/drought-forces-water-rationing-colombia/
 This Sunday, August 10, the Colombian government will establish a new water rationing system in various departments throughout the country. The goal is to conserve water, as a drought caused by the El Niño phenomenon is affecting Colombia’s Caribbean, and parts of its Andean region.
With a growing population and harsh weather conditions, it is critical that Bogota has effective plans ready to be carried out whenever natural resources become scarce, which will likely occur in the near future.
Latin America, and the world in general, is experiencing a new version of El Niño, a natural phenomenon that encompasses fluctuating ocean temperatures in the Pacific Ocean’s equatorial area.
A key fact about El Niño is that it affects regions differently. The British daily, The Guardian, discusses the 2014 version of this phenomenon, explaining that “India is expected to be the first to suffer, with weaker monsoon rains undermining the nation’s fragile food supply […] and collapsing fisheries off South America. But some regions could benefit, in particular the United States, where [El Niño …] could break the searing drought in the west.”
Colombia’s Institute of Meteorology has reported that there has been a significant decrease in the amount of rainfall in the Caribbean and Andean regions. Some Colombian departments that have been impacted include Magdalena, Atlantico, Bolivar, La Guajira, Valle del Cauca, among others.
The drought has been especially bad in La Guajira, located in the Caribbean coast. A July 24 article in the Colombian daily, El Tiempo, highlights how 15 children have recently died due to illnesses provoked by the lack of water and food.
Government and Civic Response
Given the ongoing drought, the Colombian Ministry of Housing and the Commission for Water Regulation have come to what will surely be an unpopular decision. In order to encourage water rationing, individuals who utilize more water than what the government has established as permissible will be penalized, and will have to pay more accordingly. This measure will come into force on August 10.
In declarations to the press, Minister of Housing Luis Felipe Henao highlighted that the major consumers of water in the country are the agricultural and industrial sector. “They also have to resort to rational uses [of water] and we hope that the Ministries of Agriculture and of the Environment will take whatever actions are needed to apply sanctions to those who waste water,” he declared.
Indeed, it will be important to monitor the government in the upcoming months, and whether it punishes industries that utilize water indiscriminately. These sectors are major job providers and are the reasons why the country’s economy has boomed in the past years. Hence, it will be interesting to see how far President Juan Manuel Santos’ government is willing to sanction them.
President Santos has also addressed the drought. In late July, he visited the drought-stricken Bolivar department, where he remarked that “between October to March [2015] we will have difficult moments.”
The head of state also supported water rationing, expressing that “we waste too much water […] With minimal effort we could save up to 7%.”
Finally, it is worth stressing that the ongoing drought has brought Colombian society together. For example, during the weekend of August 2-3, the inhabitants of Bogota donated water that will in turn be donated to the inhabitants of La Guajira.
More People, More Problems
The upcoming plan to ration water in parts of Colombia is not without its critics. Case in point is the city of Barranquilla in the Atlantico department. Critics of the new measure argue that Barranquilla is currently suffering a heat wave: temperatures are reaching 35-37 degrees Celsius (95-98 degrees Fahrenheit); hence, people must utilize more water to stay hydrated and avoid heat stroke.
The government has also been accused of “improvising” environmental measures instead of having long-term plans.
Even Bogota’s aforementioned support for La Guajira has been regarded as slightly hypocritical. An August 1 op-ed in El Tiempo highlights how “La Guajira is one of those departments that Colombians have regarded with indifference, like it was another country.”
Ultimately, Colombia’s resource problems, as well as those of the entire world, come down to numbers; namely population growth.
Colombia’s population was just over 47 million by the end of 2013, this is an increase of around 500 thousand people compared to 2012. At this rate, the South America nation’s population will cross the 50 million milestone in a couple of years.
More people in Colombia, and elsewhere, naturally means that demand for basic necessities like food and water will grow in the near future. While we are all focused on Bogota’s negotiations with FARC insurgents, President Santos’ real challenge for his second term will be dealing with the effects of the drought and overall proper management of the country’s natural resources.

Tuesday, August 5, 2014

VOXXI: El Salvador arrests Spanish Priest accused of aiding Mara gang

"El Salvador arrests Spanish Priest accused of aiding Mara gang"
W. Alejandro Sanchez
VOXXI
August 5, 2014
Originally published: http://voxxi.com/2014/08/05/salvador-arrests-antonio-rodriguez-tercero/


Local authorities arrested a Spanish priest in El Salvador last week after accusing him of aiding the dreaded gangs known as Maras. Father Antonio Rodriguez Tercero has stated that he only carries out charity work to support gang members who are trying to reintegrate into society.
He was freed on Monday, August 4, though his judicial challenges are far from over.
15 Years in El Salvador
The 38-year old priest, who is also known as “Father Toño,” comes from the Daimiel municipality in Spain’s Ciudad Real province and has lived in El Salvador for 15 years.
In an interview with the Spanish daily El País, Father Rodriguez explained that he came to Central America after learning about the 1980 assassination of Archbishop Oscar Romero and the 1989 massacre of several Jesuit priests.
These events inspired him to go to El Salvador to work for peace and address social inequality (For a further discussion of the latter crime, see my September 2013 commentary).
Father Rodriguez’s church is located in Mejicanos, a municipality close to San Salvador. One of the social programs he carries out is helping former gang members reintegrate themselves into society.
The Facts As We Know Them
The office of El Salvador’s Attorney General has accused Father Rodriguez of smuggling illicit objects, such as mobile phones, into prisons. They also argue that the priest has illicit associations with gang members like Carlos Ernesto Mojica Lechuga, a well-known Barrio 18 leader who is currently in prison.
As evidence of these connections, one of the alleged phones was used to coordinate an extortion operation carried out by Barrio 18 members in Santa Ana.
The Salvadoran police force has monitored over 100 of Father Rodriguez’s phone calls, which seem to be the cornerstone of the prosecutors’ accusations. “Rodriguez did everything that Mojica Lechuga ordered him to do,” a Salvadoran prosecutor has declared.
On July 29, authorities arrested the Spanish priest in his house in Mejicanos. The detention was part of a raid in which police forces apprehended 127 individuals throughout the country, charging them with different crimes. Father Rodriguez was held in the “División Central de Investigaciones,” and it was here that Spanish diplomats visited the priest.
Father Rodriguez’ arrest prompted social demonstrations in his native country. On August 3, around three hundred people protested in Daimiel, demanding his release. Daimiel’s mayor, as well as a former gang member who now lives in Spain, spoke in favor of the incarcerated priest.
Likewise, El Salvador’s Catholic Church has declared its support for Father Rodriguez.
El Salvador’s Archbishop Jose Luis Escobar Alas explained to the press that it is important “to recognize all the good work Father Rodriguez has done […] on behalf of the poor via his church’s social program.”
Out Of Prison, Not Out Of Trouble
The Salvadoran media reported that Father Rodriguez’ hearing ended at 3 AM on August 4. While the prosecution stressed his ties with leaders of the maras, a judge granted him conditional liberty.
The website ElSalvador.com has a video of Father Rodriguez after he was released. He appeared to be in good health and explained to the press that “the [judicial] process will continue.”
According to La Prensa Gráfica, Father Rodriguez is not allowed to leave the country or have associations with any gang members, and he must return to court whenever needed. At the time of this writing, Salvadoran prosecutors have officially charged the Spanish priest though it is unclear if he is still free or if he has been arrested once again.
Political Motivations?
In March 2012, El Salvador’s two major maras––Barrio 18 and Mara Salvatrucha––signed a historic peace agreement with the help of the country’s Catholic Church. Months after the truce came into effect crime, particularly homicides, dropped drastically. Nevertheless, recent reports highlight that gang violence is on the rise once again.
Naturally, the Spanish media has taken an interest in this case. The opening sentence of a July 30 article in El País states that, “El Salvador had a shocking morning,” when the country learned about Rodriguez’ arrest. The article later describes Rodriguez as having been a “heavyweight” in 2012.
A recent article by the Inter Press Service also discusses Father Rodriguez’s role in the peace negotiations, explaining how the Spanish priest initially critiqued the peace agreement but eventually came to support it.
Innocence in El Salvador
Many praise Father Rodriguez for his role to achieve peace between gangs in El Salvador. However, his connections to El Salvador’s Barrio 18 have ultimately landed him in prison. Those following the story still do not know whether the accusations are politically motivated or if in fact Father Rodriguez is actively helping gang members.
The Spanish daily El Día quotes a Salvadoran priest who recently declared that the arrest of Father Rodriguez “is a type of social or political pressure” because of his close relationship with the country’s gangs.
Civic society and religious institutions in El Salvador and in Spain are generally on Father Rodriguez’ side, but their support is not enough to be safe in a country like El Salvador.

Book Review: BOOK REVIEW: THE GULF AND LATIN AMERICA: AN ASSESSMENT OF EXPECTATIONS AND CHALLENGES


"Book Review: The Gulf and Latin America: An Assessment of Expectations and Challenges"
W. Alejandro Sanchez
Council on Hemispheric Affairs
August 5, 2014
Originally published: http://www.coha.org/book-review-the-gulf-and-latin-america-an-assessment-of-expectations-and-challenges/
  
Edited by Alejandra Galindo
Gulf Research Centre Cambridge
2013
Available:
http://www.amazon.com/The-Gulf-Latin-America-Expectations/dp/190986403X
A rock-ribbed truism is that the world is becoming increasingly interconnected, and there are fewer nations every year that can be described as isolated from the rest of the international community (i.e. North Korea or Turkmenistan). Nowadays Latin America has pluralized relations with several regions, even those that are geographically distant from the Western Hemisphere. The Gulf and Latin America, published by the respected Gulf Research Centre-Cambridge at Cambridge University, addresses relations between Latin America and various Gulf nations, such as Iran and the member nations of the Gulf Cooperation Council (i.e. Saudi Arabia).
Well-researched and archly professional, this book is meant for specialists interested in the growing inter-connectivity of nations from all corners of the world, including Latin America and the Gulf states.
A Strong Set of Contributors
The Gulf and Latin America is separated into six different chapters, each of them drafted by a different author, which discusses diverse aspects of Gulf-Latin America relations. Four chapters address Brazil, Chile, Mexico and Venezuela, with their diverse set of national interests and how they have approached Gulf nations.
The other two chapters discuss the book’s overall theme but from another point of view. Namely the chapter titled “The Role of Latin America in the Foreign Policies of GCC states,” explains where Latin America falls in the specter of priorities for member-states of the Gulf Cooperation Council. The other chapter analyzes how Iran, a persisting complicated and controversial international player, has approached Latin America in a unique fashion in order to counterbalance U.S. influence.
Each chapter is tightly researched, and their respective reference sections are quite comprehensive. It was a pleasure to see that each author took the time and patience to consult sources in more than one language, like Spanish, Portuguese, French and English. The authors also utilized healthy amounts of both older and modern sources. Case in point include the chapter on Mexico-Gulf relations cites a 1984 essay on Mexican foreign policy, hence depicting the overall level of research and intensity that were carried out by the multiple authors. The eclectic and well-balanced historical sources implant more academic weight and historical depth to The Gulf and Latin America.
Finally, a word must be offered regarding the contributors of The Gulf and Latin America. This group of high-caliber scholars and policymakers includes a renowned Mexican scholar and columnist, an official of Venezuela’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and a professor at the University of Brasilia; meanwhile the editor is Professor Alejandra Galindo from the Universidad de Monterrey in Mexico, who previously has offered us insightful analyses about Mexican foreign policy, oil diplomacy and fast-moving Arab Gulf geopolitics.
Educative Analyses
The chapters of The Gulf and Latin America provided a strong review of Gulf-Latin American relations, including a comprehensive account of the historical relations between the two regions. It may sound surprising to someone who is not a historian that these two regions did not discover each other within the past decades: their relations, in fact, date back centuries. Case in point, Mexico’s chapter explains how, “Mexico has had formal relations with the land then known as Persia since 1889, when the government of Porfirio Diaz (1884-1911) designated Sebastian Bernardo de Mier (ambassador to Britain) to be the representative to Iran,” (P. 123).
Moreover, Latin American-Gulf relations were pivotal to the creation of the most important and influential Arab-led multinational bloc: the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). This volume explains to the reader how,
Cooperation in the realm of global governance between the Arab monarchies of the Gulf and Latin American countries goes back several decades, even before the creation of the Gulf Cooperation Council. One of the most important outcomes of this cooperation was the creation, in 1960, of the OPEC. This organization was first proposed by Juan Pablo Perez Alfonso, minister of energy of Venezuela, and Shaikh Abdullah Al Tariqi, oil minister from Saudi Arabia … (P.32)
Additionally, The Gulf and Latin America discusses the national interests and foreign policy objectives of the Latin American and Gulf governments. For example, when discussing the summits involving South American and Arab countries (ASPA), Erick Viramontes, a Mexican columnist, explains,
While most Arab leaders saw ASPA as an opportunity to improve their position on issues like the Arab-Israeli conflict, the Palestinian question, and the Middle East policy of Western nations, the GCC states saw it as a means to strengthen their foreign assets acquisition strategy and to engage on issues of global governance. (P. 34)
Such explanations could not be more important in highlighting the different policy objectives of various Gulf governments.
Likewise, Mexico’s chapter also has insightful facts about Mexico City’s priorities. For example, Viramontes acknowledges that, “the relationship with the countries of the Gulf and in the Middle East in general, is more of a product of the initiative of the countries from those regions than from Mexico itself.’ (P. 122). Additionally, as an appreciated dividend, there are also a string of interesting anecdotes sprinkled throughout the chapter; like for example when the deposed Shah of Iran spent months in Mexico on a tourist visa thanks to the intervention of Henry Kissinger. (P. 124).
Additionally, this book is helpful in highlighting issues such as how domestic actors and events that manage to influence a country’s foreign policy in small ways as well as large. For example, the chapter “Chile and the Gulf: Identifying Channels of Cooperation” discusses the role of the Arab diaspora in Chile and how it influences relations between the South American nation and the Gulf (P. 182). Additionally, various chapters address the role of Latin America in the 2003 Iraq War, i.e. Chile. (P. 197). It is particularly worth noting how the chapter on Mexico associates Mexican political issues and that war, namely “when the crisis in Iraq was take for consideration by the UN Security Council […] it coincided with [Mexico’s] domestic elections to the deputies’ chamber.” (P.130) The essay explains how “political parties and some sections of society came out to demonstrate against the war on Iraq.” (P. 130)
Outstanding Issues
While The Gulf and Latin America is admirably well-written, there are subjects raised that would make a revised version even more compelling. One suggestion is that the book lacks a concluding chapter. It would have been an ideal development if Professor Galinda had written a final chapter that once again brought together the theses and various arguments of the book in order to attempt to predict the future of Gulf-Latin America relations.
The Gulf and Latin America is a strong piece of work in regards as it provides historical reviews and contemporary analyses of modern Gulf-Latin American relations. This makes it ideal as an academic offering, but, as previously mentioned, the book could also benefit from further analysis of what could happen in the future in order to make it a must read for policymakers in Latin America, the Gulf or in Washington (which has strong interests in both targeted regions).
Additionally, there are some statements or facts that are not fully discussed or outlined. One prominent example is in the chapter “The Role of Latin America in the Foreign Policies of GCC States” which explains how in July 2010, Kuwait’s then-Prime Minister, Shaikh Nasser Al Ahmad Al-Sabah, embarked on a nine-nation tour of Latin America and the Caribbean. The chapter explains that “Shaikh Nasser visited Antigua and Barbuda – which caused some controversy in the Kuwaiti Parliament,” and then goes to enumerate the other countries that he visited (P. 37). The problem here is that there is no further discussion or clarification as to why the Kuwaiti Parliament could object to the Prime Minister travelling to said Caribbean nation. Unless the reader is something of an expert on relations between St. John’s and Kuwait City, the issue is not properly explained nor is it addressed again in the essay.
Furthermore, there are a couple of issues that could have been better clarified, or require updating given recent events. For example on the chapter regarding “Iranian Policy towards Latin America as a Countermeasure against US Hegemony,” the author highlights the 1992 and 1994 attacks “against Jewish targets in Buenos Aires, Argentina,” which Iran is widely suspected of orchestrating. (P. 49) It is important to stress that in January 2013 Iran and Argentina agreed to create a very controversial joint “truth commission” to investigate the 1994 bomb attack against the Argentine Jewish Mutual Aid Association (AMIA), in which 85 people died. This move has been criticized precisely because the Iranian government is accused of having carried out attacks, so it seems contradictory to achieving justice if Buenos Aires provides the prime suspect of this terrorist attack the ability to pass judgement on itself.
Finally, the sub-section of Iranian-Bolivian relations within the Iran-Latin America chapter correctly notes that “Nicaragua and Bolivia have not seen much of the millions of dollars of promised Iranian aid, although some projects are being funded.” (P. 59). One incident that would have been worth mentioning in this section occurred in mid-2011 when Iran’s Defense Minister Ahmad Vahidi visited Bolivia. The Iranian policymaker was forced to leave the country earlier than planned as Buenos Aires and “contacted Interpol’s offices in Bolivia to demand Vahidi’s arrest as soon as Argentina became aware that he was in South America.”[1] Vahidi is currently wanted by Interpol for his alleged role in the 1994 attack as at the time he was the commander of a special unit of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard known as the Quds Force. The official left the landlocked Andean state, and issued a hasty apologetic statement. Hence, it is surprising that the author on the Iran chapter for The Gulf in Latin America, did not choose to mention this incident as it highlights how Tehran’s history with Latin America affects its current diplomatic initiatives with the region.
An Updated Version would be Invaluable
The Gulf in Latin America is another piece of the puzzle that helps provide a more complete picture of how Latin American nations are becoming more active members of the global community, as they approach nations as geographically distant as the Gulf. While some arguments and examples require greater clarification and analysis, the contributors of this book have done a very efficient job at explaining how nations like Brazil, Chile, Mexico and Venezuela, among others more briefly mentioned, have approached Saudi Arabia, Iran and the Gulf Cooperation Council. There is a diverse list of issues that can serve as a catalyst to bring the two regions further closer. This is the type of work that rightfully deserves a second, expanded edition.
At the time of this writing, the violence in the Middle East continues, namely between Israel and Hamas in Gaza. As a sign of protest to ongoing Israeli military operations and to demonstrate solidarity with Palestine, several Latin American nations (i.e. Brazil and Peru), have recalled their ambassadors from Tel Aviv. Even if this diplomatic move will have little effect on Tel Aviv’s security policies, it does stress how Latin America is becoming more interested in Middle East geopolitics along with Arab affairs. Recent developments stress the need for more in-depth academic projects like The Gulf in Latin America.
Please accept this article as a free contribution from COHA, but if re-posting, please afford authorial and institutional attribution. Exclusive rights can be negotiated. For additional news and analysis on Latin America, please go to: LatinNews.com and Rights Action.
References
[1] Robin Yapp, “Iran defence minister forced to leave Bolivia over 1994 Argentina Bombing.” The Telegraph. Bolivia. Available:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/southamerica/bolivia/8550445/Iran-defence-minister-forced-to-leave-Bolivia-over-1994-Argentina-bombing.html

Peru This Week: COP 20: Important climate change conference hosted in Lima this December


"COP 20: Important climate change conference hosted in Lima this December"
W. Alejandro Sanchez
Peru This Week
August 4, 2014
Originally published: http://www.peruthisweek.com/blogs-cop-20-important-climate-change-conference-hosted-in-lima-this-decemeber-103583


COP 20, which is to be hosted in Lima this December, will be dealing with some serious climate change issues.

The Peruvian government will host an important conference on climate change this December. Namely, the Peruvian capital of Lima will organize the 20th session of the Conference of the Parties and the 10th session of the Conference of the Parties serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol (COP20/CMP 10). Though this is a particularly lengthy name for two simultaneous conferences, the objective of both meetings is clear: to negotiate a new universal climate agreement; essentially a new blueprint for nations around the world to follow in order to combat climate change.
Even though the COP 20 is still months away, major preparations are already underway in Peru. Currently, the Peruvian government is focusing on outreach in order to secure diplomatic support before the event. For example, this past June, Peruvian President Ollanta Humala met with Ban Ki-Moon, the Secretary General of the United Nations, during the G77+China summit in Bolivia. The Peruvian media praised the meeting, reporting that the UN leader asked the Peruvian head of state to take leadership of COP 20 so that an agreement is reached. Additionally, in mid-July, President Humala traveled to Germany to meet with Chancellor Angela Merkel, where they discussed COP20, among other topics. The German government has long been a critical supporter of pro-environmental initiatives and climate change policy.
There are positive signs that the conference will allow often-suppressed voices to be heard. On July 4, the Peruvian office of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), representatives ofCOP 20, and the government of Norway all signed an agreement that will help indigenous peoples attend the December conference. The UNDP and Norway will provide logistical support for indigenous leaders to have a pavilion during the conference; this will give them the opportunity to voice their specific concerns about climate change and other environmental challenges that affect their people, like deforestation and resource extraction. The participants will represent the Indigenous Organization of the Amazon Basin (COICA), an entity that oversees the indigenous communities that live in the nine nations that share the Amazon Basin. The agreement will makeCOP 20 the first Conference of the Parties with indigenous participation.
Likewise, research centers and other non-governmental organizations are also organizing themselves for the COP 20. From July 15 – 18, some 180 delegates from research and advocacy organizations from across the globe met in Margarita Island, Venezuela, with the objective to draft the “Declaration of Margarita of Social Movements and Organizations.” The document will have recommendations that the Venezuelan government will give to the other delegations that will attendCOP 20.
In other words, COP 20 will be a place where not only delegations will go to discuss climate change while also protecting their national interests; indigenous organizations and social movements will also have the chance to voice their concerns, which some governments tend to disregard.
Nevertheless, some experts are not particularly optimistic about COP 20. For example, Eduardo Rojas, Assistant Director-General and Head of the Forestry Department at the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, declared to the media that COP 20 conference will be “very complicated” and it would be “naïve” to think that reaching some major agreement will be easy. Rojas thinks that “the real risk of the summit is that we will reach a weak accord or one that will need a long time to be carried out.”
Certainly, there is a lot at stake here. During COP 21, analysts expect a new agreement that will replace the Kyoto Protocol, which will expire in 2020. Hence, there is one clear goal for this multinational conference: COP 20 will hopefully end with a draft of an accord that will then be accepted in COP 21, which will take place in Paris in 2015.
At the domestic level, President Humala is under pressure to ensure that, from a logistical standpoint, COP 20 is successful and incident-free. However the Peruvian leader will also have another, more important task, that COP 20 is successful as a platform for meaningful negotiations for a new Kyoto Protocol. At this point, whether humanity can reverse the constant changes to the global climate is debatable, particularly after recent statements from NASA that the melting of parts of Antarctic ice may be “unstoppable.” The pressure is on for the Peruvian president to truly lead the world to save the planet this December.